On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:49:45PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> 50 milliseconds seem to work well.
>
> why don't you use the existing timeout? it exists exactly for this
> purpose.
Good idea, I just sent an updated patch #5.
(It also
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:49:45PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> 50 milliseconds seem to work well.
>
why don't you use the existing timeout? it exists exactly for this
purpose.
___
mc-devel mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
When we see an unknown sequence, it is not enough
to drop already received part - there can be more of it
coming over e.g. a serial line.
To prevent interpreting it as a random garbage,
eat and discard all chars that follow.
Small, but non-zero timeout is needed to reconnect
escape sequence split
