BSD?

2010-04-01 Thread frank
Release out experimental release 5.0 Hello Slava, Please explain how you can release mc 5.0 under a BSD licence if the bulk of it was and is GPL. (Or how we talking about Fool's Day?) Thanks! frank ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org

Re: BSD?

2010-04-01 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 09:31 +0200, frank wrote: Release out experimental release 5.0 Hello Slava, Please explain how you can release mc 5.0 under a BSD licence if the bulk of it was and is GPL. The code base is entirely different... And in fact it's not BSD, it's rather BSD-like (MIT

[patch] new pty allocation strategy for BSD

2006-02-04 Thread Roland Illig
/* !HAVE_GRANTPT */ /* BSD version of pty_open_master */ -static int pty_open_master (char *pty_name) +static int pty_open_master (char *pty_name, size_t pty_name_size) { int pty_master; -const char *ptr1, *ptr2; +DIR *dir; +struct dirent *ent; +const char *p; -strcpy (pty_name

Re: [patch] new pty allocation strategy for BSD

2006-02-04 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Roland Illig wrote: subshell.c currently contains hard-coded values for the available pty names. These names do not match with the ptys that can be found on actual systems. NetBSD 3.0 has ptyp[0-9A-Za-z], as well as pty[qrs][0-9A-Za-z], so mc can only use 64 of the 100