Re: Hello

2015-05-18 Thread David Both
The Wiki says that there is a project to collect information and complete the web documentation. So my original intent was to bring the web site documentation up to the same level as the help feature and perhaps create a PDF so it can be easily downloaded. Are there any specific persons

Re: Hello

2015-05-18 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
Hi David, On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 08:15 -0400, David Both wrote: The Wiki says that there is a project to collect information and complete the web documentation. At some point, the idea was to use the (back then newly created) wiki as the documentation project to collect everything that

Re: Hello

2015-05-18 Thread David Both
That information is actually very helpful. I will proceed on the basis that the primary documentation is the MAN page and that information will move into the help file. I have done some very basic testing and research for undelete. I find no mention anywhere except that many moons ago I found

Re: Hello

2015-05-18 Thread Andrew Borodin
On Mon, 18 May 2015 17:18:22 -0400 David Both wrote: That information is actually very helpful. I will proceed on the basis that the primary documentation is the MAN page and that information will move into the help file. Current man page is very big. We have an old idea to split it in to

Re: Hello

2015-05-17 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
On Sat, 2015-05-16 at 13:43 -0400, David Both wrote: Is there someone - anyone - here who has been working on documentation? I just want to coordinate and make sure I do not interfere with work others are doing. First task :-) :

Re: Hello

2015-05-16 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
On Sat, 2015-05-16 at 13:43 -0400, David Both wrote: Is there someone - anyone - here who has been working on documentation? I just want to coordinate and make sure I do not interfere with work others are doing. What kind of work do you have in mind more specifically? The primary source of

Re: Hello

2015-05-16 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
Hi, On Sat, 2015-05-16 at 08:01 -0400, David Both wrote: Is this the right place for documentation contributors? If not, is there another list I did not see? Yes, this is the right place for discussing mc development. No, there aren't other lists concerned with mc development. Is there

Re: Hello

2015-05-16 Thread David Both
Thanks, Yury. Is there someone - anyone - here who has been working on documentation? I just want to coordinate and make sure I do not interfere with work others are doing. On 05/16/2015 11:57 AM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: Hi, On Sat, 2015-05-16 at 08:01 -0400, David Both wrote: Is this the

Hello

2015-05-16 Thread David Both
I have just subscribed to this list. MC is one of my favorite bits of GNU software and I would like to help. I do a lot of programming in BASH and Perl, but would rather work on the documentation for MC as I am a better writer than programmer - in my opinion. Is this the right place for

Re: Hello mc Maintainers! :)

2008-03-07 Thread Patrick Winnertz
I removed Egmond from Uhulinux, he doesn't work anymore for uhulinux according a mail I recived right after sending my previous one. * having a own repository where we have different branches for every distribution and one branch for a pure patchset. Then we can start to put all patches

Re: Hello mc Maintainers! :)

2008-03-07 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 17:23 +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote: This is basically the same as your wiki idea only using a VCS instead. git would do the job quite good, but cvs will work, too, I guess. I am most familiar with cvs and svn, but maybe git would fit better. I am most familiar

Re: Hello mc Maintainers! :)

2008-03-07 Thread Patrick Winnertz
On Friday 07 March 2008 19:55:10 Pavel Roskin wrote: On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 17:23 +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote: This is basically the same as your wiki idea only using a VCS instead. git would do the job quite good, but cvs will work, too, I guess. I am most familiar with cvs

Re: Hello mc Maintainers! :)

2008-03-07 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 21:50 +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote: On Friday 07 March 2008 19:55:10 Pavel Roskin wrote: On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 17:23 +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote: This is basically the same as your wiki idea only using a VCS instead. git would do the job quite good, but cvs