Hello,
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Hello Miguel,
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 22:58, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
I have made a tarball of the current trunk release and fixing a
few issues in make distcheck, the question that remains is: what version
should we use?
Please
Hello,
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Roland Illig wrote:
We continue to use the 4.6.xx family name. I think it might be time
to change one of those numbers to identify the changes done since the
4.6.0 release in a more significant way.
I would prefer 4.7. (Just to leave the long past of 4.6.*
Hello,
Please use MC_4_6_1_PRE for the release of 4.6.1. Then we can use HEAD
for 4.6.2 and onwards.
I second that.
Sounds good.
___
Mc-devel mailing list
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Hello,
I have made a tarball of the current trunk release and fixing a
few issues in make distcheck, the question that remains is: what version
should we use?
What did you fix?
Make distcheck was broken, look at the dist-hook target, it would not
build with VPATH/different prefixes.
hello,
I have a tarball made from the branch:
http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/mc/tar.mc-4.6.1-pre5a.tar.gz
I can rename this to 4.6.1 if people want.
Miguel.
___
Mc-devel mailing list
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Hello,
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
hello,
I have a tarball made from the branch:
http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/mc/tar.mc-4.6.1-pre5a.tar.gz
The right link is:
http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/mc/mc-4.6.1-pre5a.tar.gz
Hello Leonard, mc-devel,
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 23:34 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Hello Miguel,
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 22:58, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
I have made a tarball of the current trunk release and fixing a
few issues in make distcheck, the question that remains is: what
Jindrich Novy wrote:
--- mc-4.6.1a/src/widget.c.fixes2005-06-06 15:08:52.202559824 +0200
+++ mc-4.6.1a/src/widget.c 2005-06-06 15:08:29.120068896 +0200
@@ -2363,7 +2363,7 @@ buttonbar_set_label_data (Dlg_head *h, i
void
buttonbar_set_label (Dlg_head *h, int idx, const char *text,
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 20:02, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Before releasing 4.6.1 there are a few things to be done:
- Backporting gcc-4 signedness fixes
I understand many of the developers doubt the quality of the warnings
from gcc-4, and hence the fixes proski created for them. We can look at
wget http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/mc/tar.mc-4.6.1-pre5a.tar.gz
--14:28:46--
http://primates.ximian.com/%7Emiguel/mc/tar.mc-4.6.1-pre5a.tar.gz
= `tar.mc-4.6.1-pre5a.tar.gz'
Resolving primates.ximian.com... 130.57.169.34
Connecting to primates.ximian.com[130.57.169.34]:80...
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Roland fixed a memory leak in HEAD but he doesn't know where again g.
I have thoroughly check the changes to mcedit, where I assumed the
memory leak to have been. The only things I found were two instances
where I had replaced use of the catstrs() function with
___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
---BeginMessage---
Hmm, I hope to have the Spanish translation up to date by now.
I think that most translator are part time or even little time collaborators
and
Hello,
Roland, I like your proposal, for a major release version.
But I got the feeling that we could go back to bi-weekly releases,
so with a quick release schedule, translators just need to make sure
they can catch the next train if their translations are not available.
I have
Roland Illig wrote:
day 0 (translator's prerelease)
* Set the version number in configure.ac to
${dotted_version}-translators.
DON'T commit configure.ac.
I have removed this item from my local copy. There's no need to have a
version number in a translator's prerelease.
I have also
Hello David,
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 17:55, David Martin wrote:
I think that most translator are part time or even little time
collaborators and some/most of them may have problems with
this tight scheduling. On the other hand, I know that
scheduling is a must.
...
Is it possible to open the
Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Hello,
Roland, I like your proposal, for a major release version.
But I got the feeling that we could go back to bi-weekly releases,
so with a quick release schedule, translators just need to make sure
they can catch the next train if their translations are not
Hello Miguel,
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 22:58, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
I have made a tarball of the current trunk release and fixing a
few issues in make distcheck, the question that remains is: what version
should we use?
Please use MC_4_6_1_PRE for the release of 4.6.1. Then we can use HEAD
17 matches
Mail list logo
