On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, GoTaR wrote:
There's no thing like $[..] to evaluate expressions in POSIX sh, it's
bash feature. sh uses $((..)) instead (and bash understands it too).
Here comes fix.
Does the next line work for you? I mean this:
if (( $A 10 )); then A=0$A; fi
I think it's a much
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Andrew V. Samoilov wrote:
I think patch below make audio.in much more portable.
Applied.
BTW, I don't see reason to substitute audio from audio.in.
There is @AWK@ in audiofs_copyout(), but it's hard to notice :-)
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, GoTaR wrote:
There's no thing like $[..] to evaluate expressions in POSIX sh, it's
bash feature. sh uses $((..)) instead (and bash understands it too).
Here comes fix.
Does the next line work for you? I mean this:
if (( $A 10 )); then A=0$A; fi
I think
