Hello!
> > I see that you have committed some fixed to lib/Makefile.am. I have two
> > problems with it. If the change is not trivial, please describe it in the
> > ChangeLog.
> Since I'm a newbie, I've never touched the Changelog (is it a simple
> text file or it has a special format?)
> Sorr
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 12:50:26PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hi, Marco!
>
> > Sorry for being a newbie and for not being able to find what seems a
> > very simple bug indeed. Now for the bug.
>
> No need to apologize for being a newbie, as long as you don't touch CVS in
> the same time :-)
Oo
Hi, Marco!
> Sorry for being a newbie and for not being able to find what seems a
> very simple bug indeed. Now for the bug.
No need to apologize for being a newbie, as long as you don't touch CVS in
the same time :-)
> Configure or make should be able to create a valid mc.sh & mc.csh but it
>
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 05:39:12PM +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> Sorry for being a newbie and for not being able to find what seems a
> very simple bug indeed.
> Now for the bug.
>
> Configure or make should be able to create a valid mc.sh & mc.csh but it
> seems it just copy mc.sh.in & mc.sch.in i
