Re: rpm --nosignature

2003-01-31 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! I think that mc.ext should become a script some day. It would either run something itself or it would return a command (like %view) back to mc. It would be easier to write such rules without having to put them on one line. May be it worth the efforts to implement multiline

Re: rpm --nosignature

2003-01-29 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! +# View=%view{ascii} ar p %f control.tar.gz | tar xzO control ./control 2/dev/null ; echo ; echo Filelist: ; ar p %f data.tar.gz | tar tzv That's something different. Checking for programs in PATH from mc.ext is not implemented, but it's planned. Stupid me :-( I didn't

Re: rpm --nosignature

2003-01-27 Thread Andrew V. Samoilov
Hello, Arpi Fixed in CVS: 2002-12-29 Andrew V. Samoilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] * extfs/rpm: Use --nosignature only if rpm supports this. but in mc.ext it's still there: # RPM packages (SuSE uses *.spm for source packages) regex/\.(rpm|spm)$ Open=%cd %p#rpm

Re: rpm --nosignature

2003-01-27 Thread Arpi
Hi, Hello! Can somebody with RH 8.x distro test attached patch. I don't know is that rpm option order sensitive. It's working fine. Thank you! hmm. then teh same trick (if ... then) could be used for dpkg-less systems, to fallback to ar+tar if no dpkg installed: +# for dpkg-less

Re: rpm --nosignature

2003-01-27 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! Can somebody with RH 8.x distro test attached patch. I don't know is that rpm option order sensitive. It's working fine. Thank you! hmm. then the same trick (if ... then) could be used for dpkg-less systems, to fallback to ar+tar if no dpkg installed: Yes, except that rpm

Re: rpm --nosignature

2003-01-23 Thread Andrew V. Samoilov
Pavel Roskin wrote: Hello! It could be a good idea to remove the --nosignature options (rpm) from the extension files. As an example, neither Mandrake's RPM 4.0.3 (Mandrake 8.2) nor 4.0.4 (Mandrake 9.0) has this option. (Is it RH-specific, or is it only present in newer versions?) The