Re: li'l patch (Re: Shall we have a release?)

2006-08-06 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: just noticed it and it fits nicely, so hijacking the thread. :) from the whoops cathegory ... in the hotlist, hit del on an item and then hit escape ... and guess what? it's gone! and the same for non-empty groups. trivial patch attached. i

Re: Slower viewer [was Re: Shall we have a release?]

2006-08-04 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Roland, list, On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 06:35 +0200, Roland Illig wrote: You should try mc-4.6.1 then. It gets you to the end immediately. Note that we had a long time where mc-4.6.1 had already been branched, but I had rewritten the viewer in -HEAD. Slight mistake on my behalf. Although the

Re: Slower viewer [was Re: Shall we have a release?]

2006-08-04 Thread Roland Illig
Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hi Roland, list, On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 06:35 +0200, Roland Illig wrote: You should try mc-4.6.1 then. It gets you to the end immediately. Note that we had a long time where mc-4.6.1 had already been branched, but I had rewritten the viewer in -HEAD.

Re: Shall we have a release?

2006-08-04 Thread Roland Illig
Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hi all, It would be nice if we could have a new release (4.6.2) in a few weeks. Although nothing spectacular has changed there have been some improvements in the last 12 months. If we agree on a release date I'm prepared to write down a list of changes. Please

Slower viewer [was Re: Shall we have a release?]

2006-08-03 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Roland, On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 17:04 +0200, Roland Illig wrote: The file viewer has become much slower for large files, which annoys some users. What exactly are these regressions? If I view a 40MB text file on a 256MB system pressing End actually gets me to the end much faster than with

Shall we have a release?

2006-08-02 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi all, It would be nice if we could have a new release (4.6.2) in a few weeks. Although nothing spectacular has changed there have been some improvements in the last 12 months. If we agree on a release date I'm prepared to write down a list of changes. Please tell us of any urgent issues that

Re: Shall we have a release?

2006-08-02 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: It would be nice if we could have a new release (4.6.2) in a few weeks. Although nothing spectacular has changed there have been some improvements in the last 12 months. If we agree on a release date I'm prepared to write down a list of

Re: Shall we have a release?

2006-08-02 Thread Roland Illig
Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hi all, It would be nice if we could have a new release (4.6.2) in a few weeks. Although nothing spectacular has changed there have been some improvements in the last 12 months. If we agree on a release date I'm prepared to write down a list of changes.

Re: Shall we have a release?

2006-08-02 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Roland, On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 17:04 +0200, Roland Illig wrote: The file viewer has become much slower for large files, which annoys some users. Is this something that can be fixed within a couple of weeks? Any leads on how to solve the issue? Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna