Re: Slower viewer [was Re: Shall we have a release?]

2006-08-04 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Roland, list, On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 06:35 +0200, Roland Illig wrote: You should try mc-4.6.1 then. It gets you to the end immediately. Note that we had a long time where mc-4.6.1 had already been branched, but I had rewritten the viewer in -HEAD. Slight mistake on my behalf. Although the

Re: Slower viewer [was Re: Shall we have a release?]

2006-08-04 Thread Roland Illig
Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hi Roland, list, On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 06:35 +0200, Roland Illig wrote: You should try mc-4.6.1 then. It gets you to the end immediately. Note that we had a long time where mc-4.6.1 had already been branched, but I had rewritten the viewer in -HEAD.

Slower viewer [was Re: Shall we have a release?]

2006-08-03 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Roland, On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 17:04 +0200, Roland Illig wrote: The file viewer has become much slower for large files, which annoys some users. What exactly are these regressions? If I view a 40MB text file on a 256MB system pressing End actually gets me to the end much faster than with