Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Roland Illig wrote:
what do we need dynamic loading for? It seems simpler to me to just link
to the libraries directly.
There are external dependencies which are not vital for MC and it can
function without them properly - for example the famous X11 mou
--- [ Pavel Tsekov ] ===---
> Hello Scott,
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, William Scott Lockwood III wrote:
>> Pavel, there is an old saying about rocks, and glass houses...
> I don't quite understand the meaning of this .
I have taken this up off list.
--
Regards,
Scott
__
Hello Scott,
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, William Scott Lockwood III wrote:
> Pavel, there is an old saying about rocks, and glass houses...
I don't quite understand the meaning of this .
___
Mc-devel mailing list
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-deve
Or perhaps fork it so that there is more than one release every blue moon.
Pavel, there is an old saying about rocks, and glass houses...
--
Regards,
Scott
--- [ Pavel Tsekov ] ===---
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Roland Illig wrote:
>
>> what do we need dynamic loading for? It seems si
Hello,
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Roland Illig wrote:
> what do we need dynamic loading for? It seems simpler to me to just link
> to the libraries directly.
It may be simple to you but have you considered the package maintainer
and the end user ? Or you are again just thinking only for yourself ?
Th
Hi all,
what do we need dynamic loading for? It seems simpler to me to just link
to the libraries directly.
Maybe someone once wanted to have plug-ins. But then the way we do it
currently is completely wrong. We currently load external libraries
dynamically, but the interfaces of these libra
