Hello!
> > The right solution would be to avoid mc_stat() in the "archiveless"
> > filesystems.
>
> Here is the patch. It checks the archive existence only when the extfs.ini
> says that it should need it. But it sends the archive filename to the
> script regardless to the 'archive need' setting.
Hi there!
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> The right solution would be to avoid mc_stat() in the "archiveless"
> filesystems.
Here is the patch. It checks the archive existence only when the extfs.ini
says that it should need it. But it sends the archive filename to the
script regardl
Hi!
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Your patch derives the properties of the filesystem from the existence of
> a file with a certain name. That the wrong approach. The properties of
> an extfs filesystem are encoded in the corresponding script.
The correct way would be to ask the sc
Hello!
> Here is a patch that removes the need of the ':' within the extfs.ini and
> also handles the stat() failure conveniently.
This patch makes the code less reliable. We know that some filesystems
always need a valid archive and some filesystems never need it. There are
no filesystems that
Hi!
Here is a patch that removes the need of the ':' within the extfs.ini and
also handles the stat() failure conveniently.
regards
STan
mc.no.colon.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
