Re: hotlist: now with edit

2003-02-05 Thread Adam Byrtek / alpha
There is one thing I just hate about hotlist. Let me explain on a example. I run and close and run mc again quite often in many xterms, and I don't remember whether I used hotlist in current session before. I have my favourite ftp-sites in 'ftp' group in hotlist. I run mc. I press Ctrl-\, Enter

Re: hotlist: now with edit

2003-02-05 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! +current_group = hotlist; Well, I understand you want to start with the top-level group every time. I don't use groups, so it's hard for me to judge, but I think that some users may want the current behavior. For example, somebody may want to visit every directory in the group

Re: hotlist: now with edit

2003-02-05 Thread bulia byak
Well, I understand you want to start with the top-level group every time. I think both behavior can be useful, so this can be made a configuration setting. Now with hotkeys, the hotlist is even more convenient to always start with the root group, because it's easier to press ctrl-\ and a

Re: hotlist: now with edit

2003-02-05 Thread Adam Byrtek / alpha
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 01:17:53PM -0500, bulia byak wrote: so I cannot implement your suggestion now. Also, I think it's much easier to use when all hotkeys are in a column. Now I could test your patch (after you have fixed errors I reported), and I understand you use hotkeys like User menu

Re: hotlist: now with edit

2003-02-05 Thread Adam Byrtek / alpha
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 02:58:17PM -0500, bulia byak wrote: .. - ftp samba I think it's easier to spot subgroups as you quickly scan through the empty column and see - there. Labels should be aligned with labels; when some other mark intrudes into labels I think it

Re: hotlist: now with edit

2003-02-05 Thread bulia byak
Ok, but imo you should treat '..' like a label and align it with other labels (to conform with the filesystem metaphor). Done, plus fixed a movelist bug -- __ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com

Re: hotlist: now with edit

2003-02-04 Thread David Sterba
Hi, Please report your experience. Please also share your ideas on these issues: 1. Hotkeys of entries may obscure the hotkeys of the buttons in the bottom of the list. Do we need to: block conflicting hotkeys from being entered, or warn the user, or disable button hotkeys? As for me, I'd

Re: hotlist: now with edit

2003-02-04 Thread bulia byak
As for me, I'd rather have the hotkeys assigned to the entries. Me too. So I think the options are: 1. Warn the user if a new hotkey conflicts with that of a button, but perform no further action. 2. (I'd prefer this one) Just remove all hotkeys from the buttons, to aviod any confusion. This

Re: hotlist: now with edit

2003-02-04 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! 2. (I'd prefer this one) Just remove all hotkeys from the buttons, to aviod any confusion. This is reasonable because the buttons are accessible not only via Tab, but by other keys (that cannot be entry hotkeys anyway): I think that would be inconsistent with other dialogs. I'm

Re: hotlist: now with edit

2003-02-04 Thread bulia byak
2. (I'd prefer this one) Just remove all hotkeys from the buttons, to aviod any confusion. This is reasonable because the buttons are accessible not only via Tab, but by other keys (that cannot be entry hotkeys anyway): I think that would be inconsistent with other dialogs. Yes, but

hotlist: now with edit

2003-02-03 Thread bulia byak
An updated hotlist patch uploaded: http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/index.php?func=detailpatchpatch_id=1042group_id=3521 Since nobody complained, I removed insert/append buttons; now it's one button saying add for new entry/group and done for edit entry/group. I also removed add current as