On Tuesday 09 April 2002 08:23, Björn Eriksson wrote: hello, i only found time today to reply to this.
> requirement on pkgconfig so porting mc to glib 2.0 would perhaps not be > such a good idea but I'm all for adding support for glib 2.0 if it > doesn't mangle the source too much. yeah actually thats what i was trying to ask for, before i got some unpleasant answers. supporting glib 2.0 is what i meant. there is no need to get rid of the old glib 1.2 support. i know you removed gnome support in mc a while ago but somehow mc followed my steps for many years now together with glib/gtk gimp/gnome and somehow it would be cool to see it supporting glib 2.0 specially for those people that want to move completely to glib2.0/gtk2.0 and want to drop glib1.2/gtk1.2 support. of course embedding the glib library into mc is an alternative but not a good one imo, since why embedding another version of the same library into a package while a newer version of the library is already on the system and can be used. -- Name....: Ali Akcaagac Status..: Student Of Computer & Economic Science E-Mail..: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW.....: http://www.fh-wilhelmshaven.de/~akcaagaa _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel