Andrew V. Samoilov wrote:
Hello Pavel and Olecom!
Pavel Roskin wrote:
Hello!
May I present me as little coding animal.
:-)
It's very useful patch for smbfs users. It's very little - but
powerful against windoze smb-kik programs.
Olecom, can you test backported version of this fun
Hello!
> >> It's very useful patch for smbfs users. It's very little - but
> >>powerful against windoze smb-kik programs.
>
> Olecom, can you test backported version of this function?
By the way, feel free to improve smbfs while I'm away - it's hard to
destabilize something that's already not q
Hello Pavel and Olecom!
Pavel Roskin wrote:
Hello!
May I present me as little coding animal.
:-)
It's very useful patch for smbfs users. It's very little - but
powerful against windoze smb-kik programs.
Olecom, can you test backported version of this function?
--
Regards,
Andrew V.
Hello!
> May I present me as little coding animal.
:-)
>It's very useful patch for smbfs users. It's very little - but
> powerful against windoze smb-kik programs.
Please comment your patches. Don't assume that everybody knows about
smb-kik and how it works. You are in a better position t
Good eDay !
May I present me as little coding animal.
It's very useful patch for smbfs users. It's very little - but powerful against
windoze smb-kik programs. I can start improve all smbfs user interface because of it's
very antiuser :-) - is it worth ? If [yes] I can start it alittle.
I saw th
