Re: updated: [fe95221] Rewrote the shell_escape function in order to make us of GString and g_string_append_c

2009-02-21 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Patrick Winnertz win...@debian.org schrieb: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit fe95221f05e3cc4a80effdcb886768a9eb77efa7 Author: Patrick Winnertz win...@debian.org Date: Fri Feb 6 14:32:09 2009 +0100 Rewrote the shell_escape function in order to make us

updated: [fe95221] Rewrote the shell_escape function in order to make us of GString and g_string_append_c

2009-02-10 Thread Patrick Winnertz
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit fe95221f05e3cc4a80effdcb886768a9eb77efa7 Author: Patrick Winnertz win...@debian.org Date: Fri Feb 6 14:32:09 2009 +0100 Rewrote the shell_escape function in order to make us of GString and g_string_append_c As we

Re: updated: [fe95221] Rewrote the shell_escape function in order to make us of GString and g_string_append_c

2009-02-10 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:49:57PM +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote: Rewrote the shell_escape function in order to make us of GString and g_string_append_c glib has functions for shell (un-)escaping. did you look at those? ___ Mc-devel mailing

Re: updated: [fe95221] Rewrote the shell_escape function in order to make us of GString and g_string_append_c

2009-02-10 Thread Mikhail
2009/2/10 Oswald Buddenhagen o...@kde.org On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:49:57PM +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote: Rewrote the shell_escape function in order to make us of GString and g_string_append_c glib has functions for shell (un-)escaping. did you look at those?

Re: updated: [fe95221] Rewrote the shell_escape function in order to make us of GString and g_string_append_c

2009-02-10 Thread Patrick Winnertz
Am Dienstag 10 Februar 2009 13:38:26 schrieb Oswald Buddenhagen: On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:49:57PM +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote: Rewrote the shell_escape function in order to make us of GString and g_string_append_c glib has functions for shell (un-)escaping. did you look at those?