[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ATRAC can never surpass CD quality since it stores less information than
CD-DA. For the same reasons, equal quality is also theoretically
impossible, and practically impossible without increasing the bit stream
allowed (24-bits/sample I believe).
I"m not totaly
Andrew wrote:
(hence, "wavelet"), and can reproduce the signal almost *exactly*
by compositing the wavelets at playback. This breaks the bounds of
Nyquist's rule, which states that you must sample at double the highest
frequency you wish to represent... because you're no longer sampling.
Magic wrote:
If I take a sound file which is 44.1kHz in 16bit, the same as CD, and ZIP
it
with WinZIP, it occupies less space. If I did this with all the music from
one of my CDs, I could probably copy those ZIP files onto another CD and
fit
two CDs worth of music onto it (although a
Wrote RJ Kirkland [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Actually the amount of data stored on an MD could be increased by 8x
without a blue laser, simply a slightly different red one. MD-Data2 uses
the different laser and a smaller track pitch to achieve a 5x increase in
disk capacity. Maxell has already
ATRAC can never surpass CD quality since it stores less information than
CD-DA. For the same reasons, equal quality is also theoretically
impossible, and practically impossible without increasing the bit stream
allowed (24-bits/sample I believe).
Actually the amount of data stored on an MD
From: RJ Kirkland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 7:21 PM
Subject: RE: MD: ATRAC-R and Laser Colors
ATRAC can never surpass CD quality since it stores less information than
CD-DA. For the same reasons, equal quality is also theoretically
impossible
