-----Original Message-----
From: las [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

I'm not sure if it is the compression, so much as the use of digital itself
that is causing the artifacts.  Try listening to an early CD on an early CD
player.  I think in many cases you will not be satisfied.

-----End Original Message-----

My uncle has one of the very old Philip's CD players ... top loading, silver
thing (CD-100).  It gave up the ghost about 3 years ago not bad for
something
purchased in 1984.  But I believe it also only a 14bit system, shame it no
longer works otherwise I'd be critically listening to it.  From memory in it
wasn't the sound quality that impressed me in 1984 (it sounded kinda
sterile, 
harsh and un-involving) the random track access was fantastic feature and 
the fact that no amount of playing deteriorated the sound (unlike LP's or 
Cassette) - not to forget those shiny new discs that looked so high-tech.

It is a pity that since CD, the mainstream tolerance for high 
quality recordings seems to be slipping (not including DAT which is not a 
"mainstream" format) especial when people think 128Kb MP3's sound great, 
about the only thing they sound is "free" <i.e = pirated>.  Technology has 
presented scientifically better quality formats (HDCD, SCD, DVD-A) but 
consumerism rules the roost and I doubt any of these formats will ever
have the acceptance of CD. (although this took almost 10 years to be
mainstream, so maybe more time is needed).  The question is ... where
to from here?  I have no doubt that solid state media is the way of 
the future, the only mystery is what format, and what Audio resolution?
In a world where digital camera resolution continues to go up, audio 
resolution continues to go down.  :|

Just my $0.02 USD (or $0.01 AUD) worth.

L8R   GuyC

-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to