[mdb-discuss] ::whatis ARC case

2009-09-15 Thread James Carlson
Jonathan Adams wrote: > I've written up the following ARC case for my ::whatis rewrite, and wanted > to see if there were any comments before I submit it for PSARC review. > > What do you all think? A level-0 question: is this a needed ARC case at all? I don't quite see where there's system arch

[mdb-discuss] ::whatis ARC case

2009-09-15 Thread Peter Memishian
> I've written up the following ARC case for my ::whatis rewrite, and wanted > to see if there were any comments before I submit it for PSARC review. > > What do you all think? Looks good. I agree with Jim that I don't see a need for ARC involvement here; AFAIK the ARC has never been involv

[mdb-discuss] ::whatis ARC case

2009-09-15 Thread Edward Pilatowicz
this is a great improvement and will make my debugging life better. thanks ed On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:00:33AM -0700, Jonathan Adams wrote: > Hi all, > > I've written up the following ARC case for my ::whatis rewrite, and wanted > to see if there were any comments before I submit it for PSARC re

[mdb-discuss] ::whatis ARC case

2009-09-15 Thread Jonathan Adams
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 04:18:14PM -0400, James Carlson wrote: > Jonathan Adams wrote: > > I've written up the following ARC case for my ::whatis rewrite, and wanted > > to see if there were any comments before I submit it for PSARC review. > > > > What do you all think? > > A level-0 question: i

[mdb-discuss] ::whatis ARC case

2009-09-15 Thread Jonathan Adams
Hi all, I've written up the following ARC case for my ::whatis rewrite, and wanted to see if there were any comments before I submit it for PSARC review. What do you all think? Thanks, - jonathan -- next part -- Introduction/Background --- A workhor

[mdb-discuss] debug help "0xdeadbeefdead00ef" , buffer modified after

2009-09-15 Thread Valdemar Moreira Pavesi
> 73a5380::bufctl -v ADDR BUFADDRTIMESTAMP THREAD CACHE LASTLOG CONTENTS 73a5380 73a6b0035bdffc6d0f215 5308a8 5159000

[mdb-discuss] debug help "0xdeadbeefdead00ef" , buffer modified after being freed

2009-09-15 Thread Jonathan Adams
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 05:50:24AM -0700, Valdemar Moreira Pavesi wrote: > > ::umem_status > Status: ready and active > Concurrency:8 > Logs: transaction=128k (inactive) > Message buffer: > umem allocator: buffer modified after being freed > modification occurred at offset 0x4

[mdb-discuss] debug help "0xdeadbeefdead00ef" , buffer modified after being freed

2009-09-15 Thread Valdemar Moreira Pavesi
> ::umem_status Status: ready and active Concurrency:8 Logs: transaction=128k (inactive) Message buffer: umem allocator: buffer modified after being freed modification occurred at offset 0x48 (0xdeadbeefdeadbeef replaced by 0xdeadbeefdead00ef) buffer=73a6b00 bufctl=73a5380