On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 04:29:21PM -0700, Dan Mick wrote:
> Steve Gonczi wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I am debuggin a doors problem. My question is: how should I interpret the
> >door_pc field in the door_node? As per the Mauro/McDougall book it
> > contains the address of the function that services
Steve Gonczi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am debuggin a doors problem. My question is: how should I interpret the
> door_pc field in the door_node?
> As per the Mauro/McDougall book it contains the address of the function that
> services the door.
>
> It does not look like a fully formed 64 bit add
On 09/01/09 23:02, Steve Gonczi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am debuggin a doors problem. My question is: how should I interpret the
> door_pc field in the door_node?
> As per the Mauro/McDougall book it contains the address of the function that
> services the door.
>
> It does not look like a full
Hello,
I am debuggin a doors problem. My question is: how should I interpret the
door_pc field in the door_node?
As per the Mauro/McDougall book it contains the address of the function that
services the door.
It does not look like a fully formed 64 bit address, as I cannot just do a
:di
