Jonathan Adams wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 06:24:56PM +0100, James Coleman wrote:
>> Could someone confirm that I am correct about this that oversize
>> allocations are not tracked
>> in libumem?
>
>
> They are tracked, but in a different way; you can get all of the oversized
> allocations
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 02:01:36PM +0100, James Coleman wrote:
> Jonathan Adams wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 06:24:56PM +0100, James Coleman wrote:
> >>Could someone confirm that I am correct about this that oversize
> >>allocations are not tracked
> >>in libumem?
> >
> >
> >They are tracked,
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 06:24:56PM +0100, James Coleman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am regularily looking at memory use of processes on solaris these days.
> Much of my work recently has been using libumem to track exactly what is
> using memory and
> it has proved very useful. I have found a limi
Hello,
I am regularily looking at memory use of processes on solaris these days.
Much of my work recently has been using libumem to track exactly what is
using memory and
it has proved very useful. I have found a limitation of using libumem in this
way is that
large allocations get cla
