Re: [Mediawiki-l] Associating an openid account with an existing user account

2010-08-01 Thread K. Peachey
We don't have OpenID support by default, Have you installed one of the extensions to provide this functionality? ___ MediaWiki-l mailing list MediaWiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l

Re: [Mediawiki-l] Update 1.14.0 to 1.15.4 queries

2010-08-01 Thread kilucas
On Aug 1, 11:03 pm, Platonides wrote: > kilucas wrote: > > This seems to have worked - many thanks. My wiki is now in .../ > > mediawiki/ and short urls aliasing this to .../wiki/ work with the > > following exception. > > > The only oddity is that paths to images don't retain my short urls. If

Re: [Mediawiki-l] Associating an openid account with an existing user account

2010-08-01 Thread nevio carlos de alarcão
you can create subpages... 2010/8/1 Anne Wilson > Can someone please point me to any reading about this subject? So far I > haven't found anything that explains how to do it. I tried the obvious, > from my user account preferences, but when I gave my openid account name I > was told that it be

Re: [Mediawiki-l] Update 1.14.0 to 1.15.4 queries

2010-08-01 Thread Platonides
kilucas wrote: > This seems to have worked - many thanks. My wiki is now in .../ > mediawiki/ and short urls aliasing this to .../wiki/ work with the > following exception. > > The only oddity is that paths to images don't retain my short urls. If > an article with path .../wiki/ contains an image

Re: [Mediawiki-l] [Wikitech-l] MediaWiki version statistics

2010-08-01 Thread Edward Z. Yang
Excerpts from Platonides's message of Sun Aug 01 17:39:19 -0400 2010: > I'm not sure that's comparable. If WordPress complains for being an old > version, unsavy users will want it to be upgraded for them. Whereas if > they watched the relevant mailing list they probably have the required > skills

Re: [Mediawiki-l] Update 1.14.0 to 1.15.4 queries

2010-08-01 Thread kilucas
On Jul 25, 10:20 pm, kilucas wrote: > On Jul 25, 9:52 pm, Benjamin Lees wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Kevin Lucas wrote: > > > > 1) my installation instructions said to place v1.14.0 in a version- > > > related > > > directory so it's in /var/www/mediawiki/mediawiki-1.14.0. >

Re: [Mediawiki-l] Protect tab not working the way I expected

2010-08-01 Thread Platonides
Michael Kingery (HL7) wrote: > Are there any notes that indicate that this issue has been corrected by > a more recent release? > > Shouldn't the protect prevent you from editing a page that has been > protected? It says that the page can only be edited by a Sysop, but it's > allowing anyone to ed

Re: [Mediawiki-l] Update 1.14.0 to 1.15.4 queries

2010-08-01 Thread kilucas
On Jul 27, 11:46 pm, Platonides wrote: > Benjamin Lees wrote: > >> 2) the update instructions say I might not have an AdminSettings.php file > >> but later say I must have one and it's used in the update.php command line. > >> I don't have one for my v1.14.0 mediawiki so do I need this and if no

[Mediawiki-l] Associating an openid account with an existing user account

2010-08-01 Thread Anne Wilson
Can someone please point me to any reading about this subject? So far I haven't found anything that explains how to do it. I tried the obvious, from my user account preferences, but when I gave my openid account name I was told that it belonged to someone else - so obviously this is not the way t

Re: [Mediawiki-l] Protect tab not working the way I expected

2010-08-01 Thread K. Peachey
You may be looking for something like: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgRestrictionLevels ___ MediaWiki-l mailing list MediaWiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l

Re: [Mediawiki-l] Protect tab not working the way I expected

2010-08-01 Thread Benjamin Lees
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Michael Kingery (HL7) wrote: > No, I don't think it's not a wrong message, it's not working correctly. > It is correctly telling me that the page is protected; the problem is > that it's still letting me edit the page despite that. It should stop me > from editing