Re: [MediaWiki-l] MediaWiki 1.32 is End of Life

2020-01-24 Thread Peter Presland
Yes. You're right. Sorry about that. However, the other reply from James Forrester is  useful. Peter P On 24/01/2020 17:45, Pascal GREGIS wrote: > Isn't php 7.2.26 superior to 7.2.9? It looks pretty logical to me but maybe I > haven't understood correctly what you mean. > > Pascal > > Peter Pre

Re: [MediaWiki-l] MediaWiki 1.32 is End of Life

2020-01-24 Thread Pascal GREGIS
Isn't php 7.2.26 superior to 7.2.9? It looks pretty logical to me but maybe I haven't understood correctly what you mean. Pascal Peter Presland a écrit, le vendredi 24 janvier 2020 à 16:52:02 : > Per other replies about php version requirements and the putative > difficulties involved for Redhat

Re: [MediaWiki-l] MediaWiki 1.32 is End of Life

2020-01-24 Thread James Forrester
On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 at 08:53, Peter Presland wrote: > Per other replies about php version requirements and the putative > difficulties involved for Redhat OS users, I am left wondering about how > important the stated Mediawiki php version requirements really are. > > My wondering is prompted by

Re: [MediaWiki-l] MediaWiki 1.32 is End of Life

2020-01-24 Thread Peter Presland
Per other replies about php version requirements and the putative difficulties involved for Redhat OS users, I am left wondering about how important the stated Mediawiki php version requirements really are. My wondering is prompted by the fact that both Wikipedia and the few other MW foundation si