On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 12:34 PM Brian Wolff wrote:
> Generally speaking objectcache is used as a last resort form of caching if
> you dont have apcu, memcached, redis, or something else configured.
>
>
I wonder if swapping it for a MEMORY table would be beneficial? Then it'd
behave much more like
On Wednesday, February 7, 2018, John Horne
wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 15:33 -0500, Brian Wolff wrote:
>> Generally speaking objectcache is used as a last resort form of caching
if
>> you dont have apcu, memcached, redis, or something else configured.
>>
> ...
>>
>> In the long run, I would rec
On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 15:33 -0500, Brian Wolff wrote:
> Generally speaking objectcache is used as a last resort form of caching if
> you dont have apcu, memcached, redis, or something else configured.
>
...
>
> In the long run, I would reccomend installing apcu so that cache stuff is
> stored there
Generally speaking objectcache is used as a last resort form of caching if
you dont have apcu, memcached, redis, or something else configured.
Truncating the contents of the table will make the next couple of requests
to mediawiki slower as some of the cache entries will need to be rebuilt.
But it
Hello,
We are running an old version of mediawiki (1.24.2), and have noticed recently
that overnight we are seeing that the disk utilisation is reaching nearly 100%
for almost an hour. During the night, at different times, we run a database
backup (mysqldump) and a database check (mysqlcheck). It
