and ngfd do not have URL: and meego.gitorious.org
does not seem to include them either.
--
Antti Kaijanmäki
Software Architect
Team Manager
m. +358 41 440 4187
linkedin.com/in/anttikaijanmaki
www.nomovok.com
Nomovok Ltd.
Keilasatama 3
FI-02150 Espoo
Finland
technologies into MeeGo. We
had hoped that all the
documentation and source code would end up well integrated into the 1.2
release of MeeGo.
By Profiles you mean the device category profiles defined in
compliance specification?
--
Antti Kaijanmäki
Software Architect
Team Manager
m. +358 41
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 14:39 -0400, Anderson Lizardo wrote:
Hi,
2011/4/5 Antti Kaijanmäki antti.kaijanm...@nomovok.com:
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 09:07 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Late last year, in the Architecture meeting, we had agreed to include
timed, MCE, Sharing Framework,
Non
You are not authorized to
access bug #9292. Why is that bug not accessible even though the bug
has been fixed three months ago? And why is it restricted in the first
place? A security vulnerability procedure, perhaps?
--
Antti Kaijanmäki
Software Architect
Team Manager
m. +358 41 440 4187
have connman-0.60.7-4.1 ?
--
Antti Kaijanmäki
Software Architect
Team Manager
m. +358 41 440 4187
linkedin.com/in/anttikaijanmaki
www.nomovok.com
Nomovok Ltd.
Keilasatama 3
FI-02150 Espoo
Finland
___
MeeGo-dev mailing list
MeeGo-dev@meego.com
http
software, and this might cause some confusion without the
clause.
--
Antti Kaijanmäki
Software Architect
Team Manager
m. +358 41 440 4187
linkedin.com/in/anttikaijanmaki
www.nomovok.com
Nomovok Ltd.
Keilasatama 3
FI-02150 Espoo
Finland
___
MeeGo-dev
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 12:39 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
this would be a great idea for the 1.2 compliance spec to add imo.
(but this doc is still the old 1.1 compliance)
OK, so you don't want to add anything new to this 1.1, right?
When will we begin to draft 1.2? It seems there's quite a
the libraries statically linked and keep this all
nicely under /opt/package/
Indeed the whole point to target some platform is to adapt the code for
that platform as far as possible, even downgrading to older APIs. And if
that's not an option for some reason, just go all static.
--
Antti Kaijanmäki
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 14:32 -0500, Bernd Stramm wrote:
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:21:04 +0200
Kernels have supported IPv6 for years, unless they are specifically
configured not to.
Yes, but sadly there are products where kernels are specifically
configured not to have IPv6. By stating it's
