On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 15:44 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Di, 2011-05-17 at 14:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:27 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > >
> > > If QtContacts-EDS is ever meant to work with a) non-file backends or
> > >
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:27 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
>
> If QtContacts-EDS is ever meant to work with a) non-file backends or
> b) a file backend which has longer IDs (perhaps because they were
> created before upgrading to EDS with the 32 bit patch), then hashing
> will be needed again.
>
> I
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 10:57 -0700, adam.gretzin...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
> The reason its TLS-SNI primarily is that we want to be good citizens
> and conserve IPs. We also can't get more to dedicate to each SSL site.
Of course you can. You just get IPv6, not Legacy IP.
--
dwmw2
___
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 12:22 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> Works fine. Whatever "can not work now" is meant to mean, next time at
> least posting your error message would be welcome.
For me it seems to have an invalid (self-signed) certificate. Although I
only noticed that just now; has it changed
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 10:01 +0300, Thiago Marcos P. Santos wrote:
> I'm working on UX Components and I noticed that our Switch widget can
> have labels inside (mostly ON / OFF are used, like setting bluetooth
> or wi-fi status).
Hm, I hadn't thought about these translations before.
I am distinctl
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 16:23 +0200, Vitaly Repin wrote:
> - It does not work due to the fact that (sometimes) google responds to
> our queries in the way which is not specified by the EAS protocol
> specs.
> - When Google was contacted, they rejected to answer any technical
> questions of our
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 15:44 +0200, Vitaly Repin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 08 Mar 2011, ext David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> > I've been looking at ActiveSync support recently, so I can answer it
> > even if it was intended to be rhetorical.
>
> Thanks a lot!
e. that'll take a while.
>
> Just to clarify - do you refer to your "Contacts" folder or to the
> complete Global Address List of your company which is accessible
> through Exchange typically? They are different.
He'll be talking about the GAL, which in our case i
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 09:32 -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sd_insides.png
> would that be s/eMMC/MMC in general :D ?
Yes. A NAND flash chip, that we could have done our own storage on, with
some horrid microcontroller in the way which implements its own "file
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 07:35 -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Just curious: why cant we use eMMC?
eMMC is bog-roll technology; I want to be able to *trust* my storage.
I firmly believe that we should be working with file systems natively on
flash, not these "translation layers" which use flash to pr
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 10:43 +0100, Carsten Munk wrote:
> MeeGo is basically too fat for the internal flash (250m or so) and we
> have been pursuing a non-destructive method so people can try out
> MeeGo without breaking their current setup.
Oh, for some reason I thought we had a Gigabyte of NAND
Why do we no longer have N900 images which boot from ubifs? Is there
something that needs to be fixed to re-enable it?
--
dwmw2
___
MeeGo-dev mailing list
MeeGo-dev@meego.com
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 14:21 +, Darryl L. Miles wrote:
> My brain storm of issues are:
> * Kernel and user-space support (ipv6.ko, ravd, netfilter, ...
> reciprocal to IPv4)
> * Startup/shutdown scripts and interface controls
> * Configuration management (total feature disable/enable, pri
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 13:07 +, Gary Birkett wrote:
> If the scanning is being done on binaries AFTER they have been rebuilt
> isn't that a bit fruitless ie, build this package to compare it with
> the last one to see if it needs rebuilding?
>
> surely If the source is the same it should not be
cryptography standards. Neither of competing options has such feature
> and support -- not at least for Russian crypto.
There are no PKCS#11 modules for Russian crypto standards? That seems
odd.
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 06:55 -0700, Foster, Dawn M wrote:
> Good catch. I had fixed it for meego-dev, meego-community and other
> lists, but it looks like I missed meego-packaging in my first pass.
> meego-packaging is now set with reply-to poster, instead of reply-to
> list.
Thank you!
--
dwmw2
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 14:47 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 06:30 -0700, Foster, Dawn M wrote:
> > I've changed the description for the meego-packaging mailing list...
>
> Thanks. I note you haven't yet dropped the abusive 'Reply-To:
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 06:30 -0700, Foster, Dawn M wrote:
> I've changed the description for the meego-packaging mailing list...
Thanks. I note you haven't yet dropped the abusive 'Reply-To:' header
from the lists (other than -commits as discussed)...
--
dwmw2
__
he latter failure mode is much worse. I suggest that you
always err on the side of *inclusion* rather than exclusion, if you
don't know the preferences (and subscriptions) of the user(s) you're
replying to.
http://david.woodhou.se/reply-to-list.html
--
David Woodhouse
en they asked for a private reply.
2. Give an option of *always* ignoring such abusive Reply-To: headers.
I may see if I can sneak those fixes into MeeGo :)
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Co
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 23:24 +0100, Graham Cobb wrote:
> On Monday 12 July 2010 21:45:01 David Woodhouse wrote:
> > (Almost) all decent mail clients support this method of access; how you
> > configure it varies. In Evolution it's under the 'receiving options'
> >
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 18:42 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Anyway, how would I access mail through SSH? 'ssh $mailserver dovecot
> --exec-mail imap' is to start the remote mail server, isn't it?
No, it gives you an IMAP prompt directly. Your mail client runs the
command and uses its stdin/stdout
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 15:27 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:43 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 09:43 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> >> On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 04:47:39 -0600, Robinson Tryon
> >> wrote:
> >> > At
se in the subject line which obscures the real
subject, etc.
All of which tend to arise from using certain substandard corporate
systems that aren't really proper MIME email servers at all, but are
just pretending to be.
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Techno
24 matches
Mail list logo
