[MeeGo-dev] Community hardware adaptations (Was: Comments on proposed kernel policy)

2010-12-15 Thread Thomas B. Ruecker
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:02:17AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On 12/14/2010 10:53 PM, Thomas B. Ruecker wrote: I don't see the difference between a vendor maintaining a kernel package and a community of people maintaining a kernel package Being involved in a relatively small OSS

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Community hardware adaptations (Was: Comments on proposed kernel policy)

2010-12-15 Thread Thomas B. Ruecker
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 09:47:33AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On 12/15/2010 9:26 AM, Thomas B. Ruecker wrote: Now at least Nokia for the N900 provides a much newer kernel for MeeGo, so those of us who own N900's are in good shape, but the conflict I'm trying to point out is real

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Comments on proposed kernel policy

2010-12-14 Thread Thomas B. Ruecker
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:14:06PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On 12/14/2010 3:10 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: Arjan van de Ven had written, on 12/14/2010 04:55 PM, the following: [...] 1. MeeGo will ship with one 'reference kernel', that will have one shared codebase between all the

Re: [MeeGo-dev] why my text display scratched

2010-11-24 Thread Thomas B. Ruecker
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:54:42AM +0100, Carsten Munk wrote: I'd like us to use same SGX driver on all OMAP3 devices, yes. We've verified it worked on Beagle, but it requires that everyone uses the same kernel side driver too, that is, you should be working with the MeeGo kernel directly and