Re: [MeeGo-dev] [meego-packaging] QtMobility has branched

2010-10-15 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em Quarta-feira 06 Outubro 2010, às 10:54:39, Thiago Macieira escreveu: > > I don't think it's realistic to already plan to be late... if a > > realistic schedule slips a week or two, well sh** happens. > > But if at the plan level it doesn't line up, that's not going to work. > > So we're not goi

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [meego-packaging] QtMobility has branched

2010-10-06 Thread harri.hakulinen
r 06, 2010 10:54 PM To: ar...@linux.intel.com; thi...@kde.org Cc: meego-dev@meego.com Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] [meego-packaging] QtMobility has branched Hi Arjan, The Qt Mobility 1.2 integration plan has been discussed within MeeGo Core OS program stream and "feature freeze in December&q

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [meego-packaging] QtMobility has branched

2010-10-06 Thread minjung.shin
van de Ven Sent: Wednesday, 6 October 2010 1:22 AM To: Thiago Macieira Cc: meego-dev@meego.com Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] [meego-packaging] QtMobility has branched On 10/5/2010 8:19 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em Terça-feira 05 Outubro 2010, às 17:04:03, Arjan van de Ven escreveu: >> for Q

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [meego-packaging] QtMobility has branched

2010-10-06 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em Terça-feira 05 Outubro 2010, às 18:51:45, Arjan van de Ven escreveu: > On 10/5/2010 8:53 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Released in final versions at feature freeze? Would a beta or RC suffice > > for feature freeze of core components? > > I don't think it's realistic to already plan to be la

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [meego-packaging] QtMobility has branched

2010-10-06 Thread fathi.boudra
Hi, QMF 2010w36 and Qt Mobility 1.1.0 beta 2 packages are submitted to Trunk:Testing (SR#8109 and SR#8110). Qt Mobility 1.1.x devel project: http://build.meego.com/package/show?package=qt-mobility&project=devel:qt-mtf Qt Mobility 1.2.x devel project: http://build.meego.com/package/show?package=

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [meego-packaging] QtMobility has branched

2010-10-05 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On 10/5/2010 8:53 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: Em Terça-feira 05 Outubro 2010, às 17:21:30, Arjan van de Ven escreveu: I think the Mobility 1.2 release is January, not December. then it's not going to make MeeGo 1.2, and will make MeeGo 1.3 instead Feature freeze in December means what it m

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [meego-packaging] QtMobility has branched

2010-10-05 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em Terça-feira 05 Outubro 2010, às 17:21:30, Arjan van de Ven escreveu: > > I think the Mobility 1.2 release is January, not December. > > then it's not going to make MeeGo 1.2, and will make MeeGo 1.3 instead > > Feature freeze in December means what it means; all fundamental, core > librari

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [meego-packaging] QtMobility has branched

2010-10-05 Thread fathi.boudra
> > I think the Mobility 1.2 release is January, not December. > > then it's not going to make MeeGo 1.2, and will make MeeGo 1.3 > instead > > Feature freeze in December means what it means; all fundamental, core > libraries and components need to be released at that point. > And QtMobility

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [meego-packaging] QtMobility has branched

2010-10-05 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On 10/5/2010 8:19 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: Em Terça-feira 05 Outubro 2010, às 17:04:03, Arjan van de Ven escreveu: for QtMobility 1.2 to be an option for MeeGo 1.2, it needs to be released by the end of December. I assume the Nokia QtMobility guys are committing to this. But this means we nee

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [meego-packaging] QtMobility has branched

2010-10-05 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em Terça-feira 05 Outubro 2010, às 17:04:03, Arjan van de Ven escreveu: > for QtMobility 1.2 to be an option for MeeGo 1.2, it needs to be > released by the end of December. I assume the Nokia QtMobility guys are > committing to this. > But this means we need to get a beta version few weeks before

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [meego-packaging] QtMobility has branched

2010-10-05 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On 10/5/2010 7:55 AM, Rusty Lynch wrote: Perhaps we can pull in mobility 1.2 a bit earlier then we would pull in the tip of a project, but before the 1.1 has even been released? Do we already have a significant body of additional backends in existence today in the tip of master that the backe

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [meego-packaging] QtMobility has branched

2010-10-05 Thread Rusty Lynch
On 10/05/2010 01:18 AM, alex.blas...@nokia.com wrote: -Original Message- From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [mailto:meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] On Behalf Of ext Rusty Lynch So... if I'm reading this correct then we are skipping past the entire mobility 1.1 stabilization and immediat

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [meego-packaging] QtMobility has branched

2010-10-05 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 09:18 +0100, alex.blas...@nokia.com wrote: > >Perhaps host a sandbox for the cutting edge > >mobility-1.2-hasn't-hit-tp-yet for those that really need it? > > In principle I kind of agree with Rusty but the practical implications > may ruin this. The Mobility 1.2/master branc

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [meego-packaging] QtMobility has branched

2010-10-05 Thread alex.blasche
>-Original Message- >From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [mailto:meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] On >Behalf Of ext Rusty Lynch >So... if I'm reading this correct then we are skipping past the entire >mobility 1.1 stabilization and immediately pushing the bleeding edge >work which will eventual

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [meego-packaging] QtMobility has branched

2010-10-04 Thread Rusty Lynch
On 10/04/2010 01:17 AM, fathi.bou...@nokia.com wrote: Hi Alex branched 1.1 QtMobility today, so the 'master' branch of the mobility repo will contain the workings of QtMobility 1.2, which will add support for Meego. http://qt.gitorious.com/qt-mobility/qt-mobility QtMobility 1.2 is