On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, matt wrote:
My simple meep example is coming up with an incorrect result.
I found some posts on the list regarding similar problems (incorrect
reflection coefficient calculation), where the recommendation was to
move the flux planes away from the source, by at least a wave
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, ? ? wrote:
Our group of photonic crystal has encountered a vital problem
involving the Kerr nonlinearity.
It seems that we could define the source only through amplitude. If
we want to set the power of the source as 1GW/cm^2, how to define our
source in MEEP?
See
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Lydie Ferrier wrote:
I have a problem with the function "load-minus-flux". After saving the
fourier transformed fields from the normalisation run, i did the second
run where i included the "load-minus-flux" function to compute the
relection spectra. Th second run doesn't wo
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, #YIP CHAN HOE# wrote:
I am trying to figure out the decaying function of gaussian-src or
continuous-src, and hope to hear your advice.
The default source end-time[] is infinity (never turn off) according to
MEEP reference.
And, the default cutoff[] is 3.0 and it is the n
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Andrew Andrew wrote:
I write a ctl according to some codes that Steven have given on this
list, but I can't change the position of the waist of a gaussian beam.
(define ( (my-amp sigma k x0) x)
(exp (- (* 0+2i pi (vector3-dot k (vector3+ x x0) ))
(/ (vector3-dot (vecto
Although Meep supports anisotropic materials internally (they are required
for its subpixel averaging technique), there is currently no interface to
specify this externally; we are working on this.
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Daniel Hu wrote:
I am trying to simulate light propagation in a unixial mat
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Andrew Andrew wrote:
I think I can use (get-field-point c pt) to get amplitude and then
calculate intensity by myself.
Yes, that will work.
___
meep-discuss mailing list
meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu
http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, hb wrote:
I want to calculate the mode volume of a cavity. Could anyone tell
me how to calculate it using meep?
First, you have to decide what definition of modal volume you want to use.
For example, one definition that is relevant for the Purcell effect
(spontaneous
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Jun She wrote:
If I put a circular polarizied source (Ex + i*Ey) at the center of a slab,
how to define the symmetry?
This source has no symmetry, so you can't exploit it. (More precisely, it
doesn't transform as any single representation of the symmetry group.
For a sla
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Robert Koester wrote:
Hello, I need to calculate the energie of an electric field in a certain
volume. After defining the dielectric function I wrote this to output
the values on teh screen and it works perfect.
The screen-output doesn't satisfy me and I wan to make a outp
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Lu Hu wrote:
behind in the script. The script ignores the resolution and uses the
default value 10. Now comes to a related question: at what point does
meep start to generate the grid in a typical script , or where exactly
should we set (set! resolution...)?
The grid gets
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Mischa Megens wrote:
I thought we might try figuring out the units by making the integrand a
constant.
Suppose our system is two dimensional, 3 furlong wide and 4 furlong high:
(set! geometry-lattice (make lattice (size 3 4)))
(set! resolution 20)
(init-fields)
(integrate-fi
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Christine Kreuzer wrote:
What are the units of the integration volume if I integrate over the
whole computational cell? If I want to calculate the mode volume, for
example. I use (integrate-field-function) to get the integral(eps*|E|²)
over the whole computational cell and
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Nicholas Smith wrote:
I actually had an application for this... In some simulations that I
would like to run, the metal structure might change over time due to
heat or other effects, but as far as I know meep cannot simulate a
time-dependent structure, and so the way to do i
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Lu Hu wrote:
I tried to test meep by calculating reflection from a dielectric thin film.
It looks like the results never converge to the analytical solutions no
matter how fine the grids are. Could anybody point out the mistakes
for me? The ctl file and plot are attached.
It
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, ? ? wrote:
I¡¯m sorry to trouble you again. In MEEP we could not specify the power
of the source. Rather we could specify the amplitude only. If I want to
set a source with a power 4w, what is the amplitude of the source? Is it
simply obtained by 4^0.5 = 2? However, it seem
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, xqhuang wrote:
I want to calculate the SW(surface waves) band structure of a dispersive
slab.I can get the rigorous result by TMM.But the result calculated by
Meep is not consistent with the theoretical result. I don't know
why.Attachment is the ctl file. Thanks in advance!
Hello,
My simple meep example is coming up with an incorrect result.
I found some posts on the list regarding similar problems (incorrect
reflection coefficient calculation), where the recommendation was to
move the flux planes away from the source, by at least a wavelength.
This did not s
18 matches
Mail list logo
