Dear Sang Soon,
Thanks for your detailed comments.
However, I still believe that eliminating the folded bands in a single MEEP
run could be done for the following reasons, of course, if I could correct
my ctl file:
(A) Steven G. Johnson's old reply is quoted below:
From: Steven G. Johnson
Su
I'm currently trying to use meep to get a better feel for wave front
caustics. I'm not sure if this is a good idea or not.
What I would like to do is generate a inwardly collapsing spherical wave
front, but meep does not seem to support sources with complex geometry.
So far I have been making
I appologize for the SPAM!
Indeed, if I place this line after setting the symmetry everything is
alright. I wasn't aware of that.
Again, I am sorry for the inconvenience.
Regards
Bernd
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Bernd Schmid wrote:
> I forgot to mention one thing.
> After adding this li
I forgot to mention one thing.
After adding this line it suddenly takes twice the time for set_epsilon.
I have a symmetry defined, can this be an issue?
___
meep-discuss mailing list
meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu
http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman
Hello,
I have a 2D Photonic Crystal simulation, which runs perfectly and stops
after about 20 minutes as expected.
However, as soon as I am adding this line:
(define pump0 (add-flux fpump 0 1 (make flux-region (center 0 0 0) (size 0 0
0) (direction X
the simulation stops after magnificent 4.
Hi,
I don't think your calculation is wrong. However, because you used a supercell
of sqrt(a) * a, the results should include the folded bands as well as the
original ones. Because the supercell has the area of 2 times of the primitive
unit cell size of hexagonal lattice, the 1st BZ (rectagular
Hello,
I am trying to compute a band diagram of a triangular lattice with a
supercell of sqrt(a) x a. I have read carefully the previous
discussions and hints, such as [Re: How Harminv works, Wed, 27 May
2009], [Re: Band Diagram calculation by FDTD, 2007-12-03], and [Re:
source definition, Tu
7 matches
Mail list logo
