Re: [Meep-discuss] meep-mpi scaling perf with more than 2 processors

2010-07-16 Thread Nizamov Shawkat
In your case, have you witnessed this kind of unbalanced behavior (unbalanced memory, I mean)? Sorry, I do not remember exact details. Let's see once again: 1817525 0 353m 221m 6080 R 99.8 1.4 1:10.41 1 meep-mpi 1817425 0 354m 222m 6388 R 100.2 1.4 1:10.41 6

Re: [Meep-discuss] meep-mpi scaling perf with more than 2 processors

2010-07-16 Thread gdemesy
Hi Nizamov, Thanks for your comments. I should mention the fact that the previous job correspond to normalization run, where you only have freespace PMLs. My I have only one source plane term and a set of Bloch conditions. I really don't know how meep splits the domain into chunks, but I was

[Meep-discuss] h5topng problem

2010-07-16 Thread G S
Hi J D, what Nizamov is true. You have to specify another file when using -A. This option puts the dielectric for example as background, but you have to specify the other file with the field (for example). Another thing: you use z=1, z=0. Take into account that these numbers are not coordinates