[Meep-discuss] Meep 2D

2011-02-04 Thread Özgür Önder KARAKILINÇ
Hi Stefan, I think, you can use (to-appended "ex" (at-every 0.1 output-efield-x))) at the output function instead of using (to-appended "ez" (at-every 0.1 output-efield-z))) Message: 3 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:36:10 +0100 From: Stefan Subject: [Meep-discuss] Meep 2D To: meep-discu

Re: [Meep-discuss] Source that only propagates in the positive?direction

2011-02-04 Thread p . kinsler
p.kins...@ic.ac.uk wrote: > You need a double source - essentially crossed electric > and magnetic dipoles (I posted something on this in > this ng sometime last year). Or drop a PML just behind > your ordinary source. http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.science.electromagnetism.meep.general/35

Re: [Meep-discuss] Source that only propagates in the positive direction

2011-02-04 Thread p . kinsler
Huntoon, Nathan R wrote: > I'm trying to generate a launch source that only has a direction > of propogation in the positive Z dimension. I'm using the code > posted here on a guassian spatial profile and I specify the k > vector to be (0 0 1), but this launches fields in both the + > and - z

[Meep-discuss] Meep 2D

2011-02-04 Thread Stefan
Dear Meep users, I am trying to run a 2D simulation. If my source is emitting Ez, everything works, but if I try to set my source to Ex or Ey I don't see any field in the png images I get in the end. Do I need to run a 3D simulation to model Ex and Ey or am I having another mistake? Thanks a l

[Meep-discuss] Meep 2D

2011-02-04 Thread Stefan
Hello Meep users, I am trying to run a 2D simulation. If my source is emitting Ez, everything works, but if I try to set my source to Ex or Ey I don't see any field in the png images I get in the end. Do I need to run a 3D simulation to model Ex and Ey or am I having another mistake? Thanks a