Ehh fine. I guess I'll cut a 1.2.9.
It'll contain this single patch and there won't be a lot of fanfare to it.
I'll get this out ASAP.
This bug is definitely not serious, and anyone claiming it as a root hole
should be strangled. Please don't run this thing as root in a place where
people can
On Aug 11, 11:30 pm, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
This bug is definitely not serious, and anyone claiming it as a root hole
should be strangled. Please don't run this thing as root in a place where
people can put whatever random trash they want into the system.
's/this /any/'
You may want to have a look at memcachedb: http://memcachedb.org/
2009/8/11 Adam Lee a...@fotolog.biz:
We have a medium-sized dataset (~50M entries) with small values (a few
hundred bytes) where we need persistence with a very high read throughput
and occasional updates.
To solve this, we
On Aug 12, 6:10 am, Dustin dsalli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 10, 12:13 pm, Ren jared.willi...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Though, it would be nice if SET/CAS ops could return the new CAS
value, I think.
It does in the binary protocol.
Ah nice, well it seems PHP's PECL Memcached extension
Comment #5 on issue 72 by trond.norbye: 1.4.0 binary multi-get crash issue.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=72
Fixed two other problems:
1) If the key+extras+header is bigger than the input buffer we need to grow
the buffer
2) rcurr points to the _beginning_ of the
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #6 on issue 72 by trond.norbye: 1.4.0 binary multi-get crash issue.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=72
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this
On Aug 12, 5:39 am, Ren jared.willi...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Ah nice, well it seems PHP's PECL Memcached extension doesn't support
it.
Wether that is because libmemcached doesn't yet, don't know.
libmemcached definitely does. The bindings just need to be updated.