Comment #2 on issue 74 by trond.norbye: configure script incorrectly
identifies sparc v9 as little endian, selecting incorrect hash function.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=74
FYI, I tried this on a T5240 running Solaris 10 with gcc 4.4.0 and Sun
Studio 12 without any
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #4 on issue 1 by trond.norbye: Memcached installation steps for
Drupal
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=1
This request doesn't belong in our bug database, but rather in Drupals
documentation.
--
You received this message becaus
Comment #4 on issue 80 by trond.norbye: addq is not quiet
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=80
It is easy to ignore the response in your client if you want to, because
the response packet contains the
command id so you _know_ it is a response for a addq command (and that is
Comment #3 on issue 80 by dsallings: addq is not quiet
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=80
That is correct. It was a design flaw in the text protocol we corrected in
the
binary protocol.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of thi
Comment #2 on issue 80 by killme2008: addq is not quiet
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=80
But in text protocol,there is no response even if the data with key is
existed,when
you use add with "noreply" option.Addq is equals to text protocol "add
noreply",it
means i don't
Thanks Brian. Your example helps.
JJ
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Brian Moon wrote:
>
> This example works like butter. It also shows the speed. The multi get
> returns all the data in the same microsecond. At least, on my server.
>
> http://pastebin.ca/1538366
>
> Brian.
>
> ht
This example works like butter. It also shows the speed. The multi get
returns all the data in the same microsecond. At least, on my server.
http://pastebin.ca/1538366
Brian.
http://brian.moonspot.net/
On 8/21/09 5:11 PM, Jeremiah Jester wrote:
Brian,
I just tried this implemen
On Aug 21, 9:59 pm, Jeremiah Jester wrote:
> I'm facing a bit of the same problem but with php. Followed the
> php.netexample here but the getMulti example doesn't seem to work.
> Getting a fatal
> error: unspecifed method getMulti().
>
> http://us.php.net/manual/en/memcached.getmulti.php
>
> I
Brian,
I just tried this implementation with an array of keys but am unable to get
things to work. Can you review my code below?
connect($ip,11211);
$art_keys=$memcache->get($data);
$articles=$memcache->get($art_keys);
print_r($articles)
?>
Print_r($articles) output results in the following: Arr
The place where we tend to use a lot of multi-gets is when we're rendering
something like a page that has comments from a lot of users on it and we
want to get the cached data for every one of those users who has commented,
for example.
Also, some clients (e.g. the Spy client for Java) actually do
So, the advantage really comes in to play when you retrieving hundreds
or even thousands of keys to retrieve in one page request. For example,
on the dealnews.com front page, we show 100-200 articles. Now, we don't
use memcached for that (whole other philosophy in use there), but I can
use
On Aug 21, 6:10 pm, Bill Moseley wrote:
> I've often seen comments about using multi-gets for better performance.
> First, I'm a bit curious if/why it's a big performance gain.
> Obviously, not all keys will be on the same memcached server in a multi-get
> request. Can somoene give me the one
I'm facing a bit of the same problem but with php. Followed the
php.netexample here but the getMulti example doesn't seem to work.
Getting a fatal
error: unspecifed method getMulti().
http://us.php.net/manual/en/memcached.getmulti.php
I've verified that memcache is properly compiled into php via
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Bill Moseley wrote:
> I'm perhaps more curious how people use multiple gets -- or really the
> design of an web application that supports this.
I use it for summing a bunch of per-minute keys. Or getting a bunch
of object IDs from some other source, then getting
I've often seen comments about using multi-gets for better performance.
First, I'm a bit curious if/why it's a big performance gain.
Obviously, not all keys will be on the same memcached server in a multi-get
request. Can somoene give me the one short explanaition or point me to
where to learn mor
On Aug 21, 4:20 am, Karsten wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> so do I understand it right that memcached from built-in don't support
> replication?
>
> Is there a workaround for setting up a replication of two server?
> If found this link:http://repcached.lab.klab.org/
>
> Hase someone already tried this?
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Owner: dsallings
Labels: Component-Docs
Comment #1 on issue 80 by dsallings: addq is not quiet
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=80
This appears to be a documentation bug.
The quiet commands are intended to not respond for nor
Hi guys,
so do I understand it right that memcached from built-in don't support
replication?
Is there a workaround for setting up a replication of two server?
If found this link: http://repcached.lab.klab.org/
Hase someone already tried this?
Regards,
Karsten
Jim Spath wrote:
> Maybe you sho
Hello JC and al.,
will your fixed size prefix patch (per prefix detailed statistics) be
finally merged into mainline ?
Thanks.
Regards,
Didier.
On 24 juil, 11:37, JC wrote:
> By the way, is this patch going to be integrated in the mainline?
> I mean, I would understand the whole feature to
Comment #1 on issue 76 by james.cohen: The spec file is not up to date
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=76
I spotted another build problem too with the includes directory missing.
Attached is
a diff compared to the v1.4.0 dist .spec file which allows for a good build
on C
20 matches
Mail list logo
