Yo,
I'm debating a small patch for 1.4.2 that would add (more) commandline
warnings for memcached. You'd of course only see most of them if you fire
it up without the -d option, but hopefully in the course of testing
someone tries that.
For exampple, if someone sets `-m 12` they'd get a warning
+1
Warnings are good.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:08 PM, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
Yo,
I'm debating a small patch for 1.4.2 that would add (more) commandline
warnings for memcached. You'd of course only see most of them if you fire
it up without the -d option, but hopefully in the
dormando wrote:
Yo,
I'm debating a small patch for 1.4.2 that would add (more) commandline
warnings for memcached. You'd of course only see most of them if you fire
it up without the -d option, but hopefully in the course of testing
someone tries that.
For exampple, if someone sets `-m 12`
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:58 AM, Matt Ingenthron ingen...@cep.net wrote:
I think this is a great. Anything which helps users be self sufficient and
not shoot themselves in the foot is a good idea. In fact, you could even
say 'refuse to start' unless there is a --overridesafety type thing for
+1
This would help weed out the basic configuration blunders.
Cloud these also show up in the stats display. At the end?
Warnings:
100% Misses, keys may be wrong.
Memory waste over 50%.
Threads greater than CPUs.
Connections at or near the limit.
Process swapping, size set too large for
