Updates:
Status: Done
Comment #2 on issue 113 by eric.d.lambert: Please add a new java memcached
client
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=113
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of t
Updates:
Owner: eric.d.lambert
Comment #1 on issue 113 by eric.d.lambert: Please add a new java memcached
client
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=113
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fi
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 113 by killme2008: Please add a new java memcached client
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=113
Here is a new java memcached client http://code.google.com/p/xmemcached/
any body will add this client to wiki
Comment #2 on issue 112 by higepon: Please add Erlang memcached client
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=112
Thanks.
In the meantime, having a comprehensive list of what's out there is
useful.
I agree.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Owner: dsallings
Comment #1 on issue 112 by dsallings: Please add Erlang memcached client
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=112
Great, thanks. Hoping to get some of these clients corralled in a way as
to make it
clear which ones should
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 112 by higepon: Please add Erlang memcached client
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=112
Will you please add my memcached client for Erlang to ht
tp://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/Clients?
http://gith
All,
We are noticing a weird behavior with Spy memcached client and wanted
to see if there is anyone else with same problem.
Test Scenario:
We try to use getBulk/asyncGetBulk with Spy memcached client fetching
250 objects from memcached with 10 threads.
Problem:
We consistently see that the fi
If your stored data is small,i think you may try xmemcached,
http://code.google.com/p/xmemcached/
2009/12/10 Adam Lee
> Spy performs *much* better for us, but our needs might be different
> from yours. We're running in a _highly_ concurrent environment-- most
> of our front-end machines are 32
oh definitely.
I am glad that I have been corrected about the way I was approaching
memcached.
Thanks a ton guys for this clear explanation.
and memcached is a reliable product, i have done a successful POC
using it and it worked just as expected.
Giriraj.
On Dec 9, 8:48 am, IvoLucien wrote:
>
After some sleep and perspective, it occurs to me that I can just have
a separate instance of memcached for each app on the same machine,
yes? The main thing I was thinking of is the beta period where I want
to reality check updates on the live machine, then hot swap the apps
involved.
Unless the
Spy performs *much* better for us, but our needs might be different
from yours. We're running in a _highly_ concurrent environment-- most
of our front-end machines are 32 or 64 core SunFire CMT machines.
(T1000, T5120, etc)
But, yes, if you search the archives, there has been some extensive
perfo
TokyoTyrant/TokyoCabinet is definitely an excellent product. We use
it in addition to Memcached and it works absolutely great for us.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:53 PM, IvoLucien wrote:
> To paraphrase what folks have already said with a bit more
> explanation, it is impossible to iterate over memc
-Original Message-
From: memcached@googlegroups.com [mailto:memcac...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of loc
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 11:46 PM
To: memcached
Subject: Re: wave invites
Could I get an invite?
Thank you
Laurent
On Dec 8, 5:32 pm, Clint Webb wrote:
> Oops. sorry list
Back up a bit: Why are your applications flushing a cache they share with
other applications in the first place?
/Henrik
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 03:22, IvoLucien wrote:
> My guess is there is no standard way of flagging that a server is live
> and that apps should not flush the cache, since app
Could I get an invite?
Thank you
Laurent
On Dec 8, 5:32 pm, Clint Webb wrote:
> Oops. sorry listers. I thought I was replying to the individual.
> I'll reply to the individual from now on.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Clint Webb wrote:
> > On its way.
>
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9
Hi, all,
Long time since last release, anyway we got new release. This version
supports the new per-queue statistics which helps us to get the length
of queue instantly and know all pops and pushes that we have done.
This is very useful in production and make us take full control of our
applicatio
17 matches
Mail list logo
