Hey,
I promised myself I'd give it another once over for formatting and obvious
issues first, but I find myself not... caring as much.
So be warned, I have to go back through most of this and fix formatting +
typos + wording, and it's missing sections on almost every page. The
unlinked portions a
(2010/04/10 15:52), Trond Norbye wrote:
>
> Sorry for being silent for a bit, but I was trying to think this through.
> I've refactored the code now so that it should allow you to do what you want
> (but in a slightly different way). Instead of providing functions to query
> the individual parts o
(2010/04/12 9:56), KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> (2010/04/10 15:52), Trond Norbye wrote:
>>
>> Sorry for being silent for a bit, but I was trying to think this through.
>> I've refactored the code now so that it should allow you to do what you want
>> (but in a slightly different way). Instead of providing
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Ryan Tomayko wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:14 AM, dormando wrote:
>> Just about all respones should happen sub-ms (excepting for network
>> jitter).
>
> Thanks for the quick response.
>
>> Some stuff you can check for offhand:
>>
>> - List versions of all relat
