Hello,
I have a server that roughly have 2000 hits per second on
memcached, I have seen
about 0.06% GETs got response time higher than 10ms, is it
something expected?
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/NewPerformance
that's probably packet loss, system swapping, or your box is
I am using pcre memcache module as the client with a apache+prefork
setup, on the client side it is also about 2000 requests per second
(i.e. 1 memcached get per request). It is roughly full loaded but I
don't think is heavy.
Memcached is deployed on another server, the problem is it is deployed
I hadn't read the paper, just the abstract of the talk at Velocity. It
read like FUD, so I wanted to confirm/deny that here. Thanks to Vladimir
for posting the link and allowing us to sort that out.
Well, there are some bottleneck. For example with UDP memcache wakes
up all childs when a
Today is your last chance to submit a CFP abstract for the 2010 Surge
Scalability Conference. The event is taking place on Sept 30 and Oct 1,
2010 in Baltimore, MD. Surge focuses on case studies that address
production failures and the re-engineering efforts that led to victory
in Web
Hello,
I know that memcached is designed to get its speed from the fast
access to RAM. But RAM is still very expensive - even with the amount
of RAM you get for the same money increasing every year.
When I thought of using PCIe SSDs instead of RAM I wasn't doing this
with regard to persistence
Is anyone going to be at OSCON and looking for a booth to stand in
and look cool? We've got room for more volunteers for the memcached
booth for the elite (read: willing) among you.
If you're going to be in Portland July 21st and/or 22nd and would be
willing to help out at all, please let
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Dustin dsalli...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone going to be at OSCON and looking for a booth to stand in
and look cool? We've got room for more volunteers for the memcached
booth for the elite (read: willing) among you.
If you're going to be in Portland July
