Re: Issue 107 in memcached: binary protocol can only parse 1 command within a recieved udp / tcp buffer

2010-11-10 Thread memcached
Updates: Owner: eric.d.lambert Comment #1 on issue 107 by eric.d.lambert: binary protocol can only parse 1 command within a recieved udp / tcp buffer http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=107 (No comment was entered for this change.)

Re: Issue 106 in memcached: binary protocol parsing can cause memcached server lockup

2010-11-10 Thread memcached
Updates: Owner: eric.d.lambert Comment #3 on issue 106 by eric.d.lambert: binary protocol parsing can cause memcached server lockup http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=106 this looks similar to the problem with issue 158, so i'll take a look at this

Re: Issue 123 in memcached: Cross compile OpenWrt

2010-11-10 Thread memcached
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #7 on issue 123 by trond.norbye: Cross compile OpenWrt http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=123 The problem in configure was that it tried to use try_run_ifelese, and that don't work for cross compilation. Update your compiler and try again

Re: 1MB limit on object size

2010-11-10 Thread Abhilash
Thanks All, So to use the custom Transconder, I am using public Future set(String key,int exp,T o,Transcoder tc) of net.spy.memcached.MemcachedClient and passing 'new SerializingTranscoder(max)' as the Transcoder object, with the higher limit I need. instead of public Future set(String key,int

Re: Issue 140 in memcached: "stats items" does not return correct "age" value

2010-11-10 Thread memcached
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #5 on issue 140 by trond.norbye: "stats items" does not return correct "age" value http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=140 The problem is that the stats items don't check if the oldest entry is expired or not.

Re: 1MB limit on object size

2010-11-10 Thread Alex Miller
Hi Abhilash, The Java client performs a size check on requests prior to making the Memcache connection to stop excessive network usage if you accidentally try to store more. You must configure the client to accept larger objects. You may be able to do this in a config file, or it may require recom

Re: 1MB limit on object size

2010-11-10 Thread Dustin
On Nov 10, 4:21 pm, Abhilash wrote: > I meant to run it with 5MB, so I have corrected it by changing it from > 5120 to 5242880. Ah, then use -I 5mb > Even after running memcached with 5MB, I still get the error message - > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot cache data > lar

Re: 1MB limit on object size

2010-11-10 Thread Abhilash
Thanks Trond, I changed the way I start memcached, as you suggested. Can someone please respond to my last point? >Even after running memcached with 5MB, I still get the error message - >Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot cache data >larger than 1048576 bytes (1MB) (you tried t

Re: 1MB limit on object size

2010-11-10 Thread Abhilash
Thanks Trond, I changed the way I start memcached, as you suggested. Can someone please respond to my last point? >Even after running memcached with 5MB, I still get the error message - >Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot cache data >larger than 1048576 bytes (1MB) (you tried t

Re: Test failing using Sun Studio 11 compiler on 5.10 sparc

2010-11-10 Thread Trond Norbye
On 2. nov. 2010, at 10.36, nooby wrote: > Hi, > > I got memcached 1.4.5 to compile however the following test failed: > > Assertion failed: response->message.header.response.status == status, > file testapp.c, line 823 > *** Signal 6 - core dumped > make: Fatal error: Command failed for target

Re: Issue 131 in memcached: Outdated info in changelog?

2010-11-10 Thread memcached
Updates: Status: Done Comment #7 on issue 131 by trond.norbye: Outdated info in changelog? http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=131 (No comment was entered for this change.)

Re: 1MB limit on object size

2010-11-10 Thread Trond Norbye
On 10. nov. 2010, at 16.21, Abhilash wrote: > Hi Dustin, thanks for the quick response. Please see my comments > below. > >> You've really gone out of your way to run it as root. Why is it so >> important to you to do that? I think it's a rather awful idea. > > Can you please suggest the best

Re: 1MB limit on object size

2010-11-10 Thread Abhilash
Hi Dustin, thanks for the quick response. Please see my comments below. >You've really gone out of your way to run it as root. Why is it so >important to you to do that? I think it's a rather awful idea. Can you please suggest the best way to run memcached, if running it as root a bad idea. Cor

Re: Issue 138 in memcached: I can't install memcached on HP-UNIX,can you help me?

2010-11-10 Thread memcached
Updates: Status: Done Comment #4 on issue 138 by trond.norbye: I can't install memcached on HP-UNIX,can you help me? http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=138 Seems like you figured this one out. I'm closing the issue now that you've got a workaround. It would be nic

Re: Issue 111 in memcached: compile errors: array subscript has type 'char'

2010-11-10 Thread memcached
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #7 on issue 111 by trond.norbye: compile errors: array subscript has type 'char' http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=111 (No comment was entered for this change.)

Re: Issue 124 in memcached: Please add Erlang memcached client

2010-11-10 Thread memcached
Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #1 on issue 124 by trond.norbye: Please add Erlang memcached client http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=124 The link ( http://github.com/jacknyfe/mcd ) seeems to be dead

Re: 1MB limit on object size

2010-11-10 Thread Dustin
On Nov 10, 2:51 pm, Abhilash wrote: > Memcached server version:  memcached-1.4.5 on Linux 64Bit > spy memcached client version:  memcached-2.5 > sudo memcached -d -m 10240 -u root -I 5120 -u root -l [host] -p 11311 You've really gone out of your way to run it as root. Why is it so important

Re: 1MB limit on object size

2010-11-10 Thread Abhilash
Hi, I have same problem, but starting memcached with -I is causing a different issue. Can you please help? Memcached server version: memcached-1.4.5 on Linux 64Bit spy memcached client version: memcached-2.5 I have two Memcached Servers and they are started with following command sudo memcach

Re: Issue 155 in memcached: able to tokenize and process mulitple IP addresses when option -l is passed

2010-11-10 Thread memcached
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 155 by trond.norbye: able to tokenize and process mulitple IP addresses when option -l is passed http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=155 Fixed in c605b31f2323aa0b81af65ce0bfbe0da249cb08b

Re: Issue 161 in memcached: cache_create fatal error

2010-11-10 Thread memcached
Comment #2 on issue 161 by zhuizhuhaomeng: cache_create fatal error http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=161 So happy that I find a bug.

Re: Issue 162 in memcached: Starting memcached from cron or sudo eats 1.5GB Virtual Memory

2010-11-10 Thread memcached
Comment #4 on issue 162 by ferranbonas: Starting memcached from cron or sudo eats 1.5GB Virtual Memory http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=162 And the one with the 80Mb: 22184: memcached -d -p 11211 -u memcached -m 2048 -c 65535 -P /var/run/memcached/memcached.pid -l 10.1

Re: Issue 162 in memcached: Starting memcached from cron or sudo eats 1.5GB Virtual Memory

2010-11-10 Thread memcached
Comment #3 on issue 162 by ferranbonas: Starting memcached from cron or sudo eats 1.5GB Virtual Memory http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=162 Here isthe pmap of the daemon with high virtual mem usage: 16977: memcached -d -p 11211 -u memcached -m 2048 -c 65535 -P /var/run

Re: Issue 162 in memcached: Starting memcached from cron or sudo eats 1.5GB Virtual Memory

2010-11-10 Thread memcached
Comment #2 on issue 162 by ferranbonas: Starting memcached from cron or sudo eats 1.5GB Virtual Memory http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=162 [r...@em-lam-front-01 ~]# memcached -d -p 11211 -u memcached -m 2048 -c 65535 -P /var/run/memcached/memcached.pid -l 10.13.0.120 [

Re: Issue 161 in memcached: cache_create fatal error

2010-11-10 Thread memcached
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 161 by trond.norbye: cache_create fatal error http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=161 You're right. Seems that the cache wouldn't work if you tried to use a cache setup with less than a pointer size... luckily for us we never

Re: Issue 162 in memcached: Starting memcached from cron or sudo eats 1.5GB Virtual Memory

2010-11-10 Thread memcached
Comment #1 on issue 162 by trond.norbye: Starting memcached from cron or sudo eats 1.5GB Virtual Memory http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=162 I tried to reproduce this on Solaris, but I failed.. from ./memcached: PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU P

Issue 162 in memcached: Starting memcached from cron or sudo eats 1.5GB Virtual Memory

2010-11-10 Thread memcached
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 162 by ferranbonas: Starting memcached from cron or sudo eats 1.5GB Virtual Memory http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=162 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1.Start memcached using "sudo memcached" or