Hey all,
Here's a long-ish story for you, and at the end I'll ask for some suggestions.
We have been able to 'swimlane' our traffic into two realms,
transactional (TX) and read-only (RO). This enables us to have lower
load on our TX/master db, and have all the RO servers talk to
replicated slave
> #2 lead to a lot of talk of how to handle 'network fault tolerance'.
> I've realized that *most other* people's fault-tolerance is achieved
> by being on an intranet and the clients' ability to handle going from
> N -> (N-1) physical nodes fairly gracefully. This doesn't really apply
> for us, be
On 3/9/11 8:36 PM, dormando wrote:
So when you CRUD against the database, you send another command with the
UDF in it to DELETE or SET against the memcached cluster local to that
database. You can pair it inside a dummy INSERT or UPDATE or trigger or
sproc or whatever floats your boat. (unless I
> On 3/9/11 8:36 PM, dormando wrote:
> >
> > So when you CRUD against the database, you send another command with the
> > UDF in it to DELETE or SET against the memcached cluster local to that
> > database. You can pair it inside a dummy INSERT or UPDATE or trigger or
> > sproc or whatever floats y
i started to build somwthing similar, but rather than an in-app queue, it
was external. basically, write your new entries into a fifo or a circular
buffer on some external box(es) and have as many boxes as you need/can
afford watching this and writing all entries to cache.
this frees the app from