Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 169 by dorma...@rydia.net: probably incorrect treatment
of negative expiration time
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=169
Fixed for 1.4.7.
I basically settled on what ends up being the same workaround as the second
poster
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #2 on issue 168 by dorma...@rydia.net: storage commands flags
negative integer parsing
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=168
I actually can't reproduce this... closing the bug.
set a -2147483649 0 1
CLIENT_ERROR bad command line form
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #9 on issue 162 by dorma...@rydia.net: Starting memcached from cron
or sudo eats 1.5GB Virtual Memory
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=162
I'm going to close this... users with weird platforms should use ulimit -s
to avoid excessi
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #6 on issue 186 by dorma...@rydia.net: Thread stack size should be
set explicitly to reduce virtual memory usage
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=186
Yeah, I'm going to close this as well. We don't really have time to go
searching
Comment #4 on issue 207 by zohaib.h...@gmail.com: cachedump out of memory
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=207
I have applied a fix to display a cleaner in-case FUTURE is disabled; bug
was raised to due to the buf remaining NULL when the item_cachedump call
was not compile
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 215 by zohaib.h...@gmail.com: Source code ( a joke probably )
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=215
I don't know what to say but I am not sure if this I get you correctly,
here is memcached.c:
166 /** ex
On Aug 8, 10:00 pm, neilmckee wrote:
> > Well, all the memcached operations are built on top of it... do you
> > mean specifically multiget might call into the engine multiple times
> > for a single "request"?
>
> Yes. That's one example. I think there were others where the
> memcache operat
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 215 by dorma...@rydia.net: Source code ( a joke
probably )
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=215
Please don't use the bug tracker for commentary. If you have a question,
e-mail the list directly or ask in IRC.
the firs
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 181 by dorma...@rydia.net: 4 billion seconds added to
expiry when system time steps backwards
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=181
Just made the clock monotonic for 1.4.7... Leaving a test instance running
for the next we
On Aug 9, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Dustin wrote:
>
> On Aug 8, 10:00 pm, neilmckee wrote:
>
>>> Well, all the memcached operations are built on top of it... do you
>>> mean specifically multiget might call into the engine multiple times
>>> for a single "request"?
>>
>> Yes. That's one example. I
Hi all,
I have just published a new memcache binding for lua. It runs on lua
5.2.0-beta.
It is coded entirely in lua, but it relies upon another of my libraries
which provides a socket interface.
This socket library works wonderfully on Windows, but is untested on
POSIX.
(POSIX spe
Comment #2 on issue 215 by zohaib.h...@gmail.com: Source code ( a joke
probably )
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=215
Please checkout engine-pu/engines/default_engine/items.c Line 386 I don't
know if you have gone through code of this part but process_started is
someth
Comment #3 on issue 215 by dorma...@gmail.com: Source code ( a joke
probably )
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=215
This is not a bug. This is pedantic.
13 matches
Mail list logo
