Key * in memcached

1. How would you port the redis command “KEYS *” to memcached? [Assume that this will be used for a very large number of keys in a production environment. Please justify your answers and explain how they meet the stated needs.]

Re: Key * in memcached

> > 1.   How would you port the redis command “KEYS *” to memcached? > > [Assume that this will be used for a very large number of keys in a > production environment. Please justify your answers and explain how they meet > the stated needs.] > Your phrasing sounds like you're reading from a

Re: Key * in memcached

HI, Is there any alternative in memcached ? or can we write a custom function for that ? i need a help please suggest me. will below function work: function getMemcacheKeys() { $memcache = new Memcache; $memcache->connect('127.0.0.1', 11211) or die ("Could not connect to memcach

Re: [Memcached] Twemproxy

I think Moxi processes items in batches already and not one by one. At least it reads all the items on the socket, then processes them, and get back to the socket, I don t know if you mean the same thing by "They did say they focused on batching together lots of operations over individual item late

Re: Key * in memcached

This functionality is support by Redis . But we also implemented it over our Memcached Service . Best, Yiftach On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Piyush Patel wrote: > HI, > > Is there any alternative in memcached ? or can we write a custom function >

Re: licensing for memcached

I just downloaded the latest tarball yesterday but did not see a LICENSE file. There is a README, AUTHORS, NEWS and COPYING file but none of these refer to a license. On Thursday, July 5, 2012 2:36:35 PM UTC-4, jennindg wrote: > > could you please point me to the licensing information for memcac

Re: licensing for memcached

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:44 PM, jennindg wrote: > I just downloaded the latest tarball yesterday but did not see a LICENSE > file. There is a README, AUTHORS, NEWS and COPYING file but none of these > refer to a license. Did you try looking in the COPYING file? Trond

Re: Storage Engines?

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Brian Moon wrote: > I just want it all! Is that too much to ask! Expecting binary client support, not only in the language of your choice but packaged in the extension mode of your choice seems a little much... Is riak over http really a big problem for you? --

Re: Storage Engines?

Expecting binary client support, not only in the language of your choice but packaged in the extension mode of your choice seems a little much... Is riak over http really a big problem for you? Hmm, memcached has it. Redis has it. If you want your product to be used seriously by the PHP commu

Re: Storage Engines?

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Brian Moon wrote: > > Hmm, memcached has it. Redis has it. If you want your product to be used > seriously by the PHP community, that is the only way to go. Native PHP + > HTTP is just not an option. But the free product you want probably wouldn't have any reason

Re: licensing for memcached

Sorry, it's called COPYING, not LICENSE. On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, jennindg wrote: > I just downloaded the latest tarball yesterday but did not see a LICENSE > file. There is a README, AUTHORS, NEWS and COPYING file but none of these > refer to a license. > > On Thursday, July 5, 2012 2:36:35 PM UTC-