Re: Issue 275 in memcached: binary protocol TOUCH,GAT,GATQ bug

Comment #7 on issue 275 by uzza...@gmail.com: binary protocol TOUCH,GAT,GATQ bug http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=275 Here is a patch that solves the problem. process_bin_touch() was reading only header without extra fields, so exptime was always 0. Attachments:

Re: Issue 275 in memcached: binary protocol TOUCH,GAT,GATQ bug

Comment #8 on issue 275 by uzza...@gmail.com: binary protocol TOUCH,GAT,GATQ bug http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=275 P.S. Send pull request at github with the same code.

Re: Issue 280 in memcached: Enhancement Request - "monitor" a la Redis, potentially "monitor [grepStr]"

We have integrated this capability into our memcached-cloud service, see more details here On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:43 AM, wrote: > Status: New > Owner: > Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium > >

Re: Issue 280 in memcached: Enhancement Request - "monitor" a la Redis, potentially "monitor [grepStr]"

Stop advertising on everything. jesus. On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Yiftach Shoolman wrote: > We have integrated this capability into our memcached-cloud service, see more > details here > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:43 AM, wrote: > Status: New > Owner: > Labels: Type-Defect Pr