Re: Issue 260 in memcached: memcached big bug

2013-03-11 Thread memcached
Comment #23 on issue 260 by edwardqu...@gmail.com: memcached big bug http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=260 (gdb) c Continuing. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb6cc5b40 (LWP 11734)] do_slabs_alloc (id=1, size=size@entry=73) at slabs.c

Re: Issue 260 in memcached: memcached big bug

2013-03-11 Thread memcached
Comment #22 on issue 260 by dorma...@rydia.net: memcached big bug http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=260 what was the original error for that last backtrace? -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You

Re: Issue 260 in memcached: memcached big bug

2013-03-11 Thread memcached
Comment #21 on issue 260 by edwardqu...@gmail.com: memcached big bug http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=260 It happened again sooner than I expected. I'll see if I can get another one for you. (gdb) bt #0 do_slabs_alloc (id=1, size=size@entry=73) at slabs.c:241 #1 slabs_alloc

Re: Issue 260 in memcached: memcached big bug

2013-03-11 Thread memcached
Comment #20 on issue 260 by edwardqu...@gmail.com: memcached big bug http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=260 This was the first one I did, so I'll check again and get back to you on that tomorrow (probably). Sure. I've copied this info to http://linuxproblems.org/memcached/ alo

Re: Issue 260 in memcached: memcached big bug

2013-03-11 Thread memcached
Comment #19 on issue 260 by dorma...@rydia.net: memcached big bug http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=260 Do the backtraces always the look the same for you? can we get a look at "stats settings" / "stats" / "stats slabs" / "stats items" as well? thank you! -- You received

Re: Issue 260 in memcached: memcached big bug

2013-03-11 Thread memcached
Comment #18 on issue 260 by edwardqu...@gmail.com: memcached big bug http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=260 Here is a back trace. I get the segmentation error every day (fedora 18 memcached-1.4.15-2.fc18.i686) [root@www2 quick]# gdb memcached 9128 GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora (7.5.1

Re: Memcached cluster

2013-03-11 Thread Henrik Schröder
Memcached is a cache, not storage, you really shouldn't use it as such. When you set a value in memcached, you have no guarantees whatsoever that you'll be able to get the value back afterwards. You're guaranteed to get the latest value set if you get something, and you're guaranteed to not get a v

Re: Memcached cluster

2013-03-11 Thread Oleksandr Drach
Hello Dormando! Thanks for your reply. Description and requirements are: - Memcached will be used a primary storage (i.e. not for caching MySQL). - It should have failover feature (in case if one server fails all connections goes to another server). Basically something like Master-Slave will be