Re: Issue 317 in memcached: {Feature Request}:Allow different type of compression than deflate for large values.

Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #6 on issue 317 by dorma...@rydia.net: {Feature Request}:Allow different type of compression than deflate for large values. http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=317 closing -- You received this message because this project is configured

Re: Issue 323 in memcached: Memcache.c function conn *conn_new in line 421 there is an condition error

Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #3 on issue 323 by dorma...@rydia.net: Memcache.c function conn *conn_new in line 421 there is an condition error http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=323 ignoring. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send

Re: Issue 324 in memcached: dead lock occur when get one key from memcache

Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #2 on issue 324 by dorma...@rydia.net: dead lock occur when get one key from memcache http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=324 Does this happen with the latest version? I think 1.4.10 had a hang in it which was fixed. -- You received

Re: Issue 329 in memcached: want to use memcached as a windows service

Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #1 on issue 329 by dorma...@rydia.net: want to use memcached as a windows service http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=329 sorry, we don't have official windows installers. -- You received this message because this project is configured

Re: Issue 332 in memcached: The configuration of item size (-I) does not work?

Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #1 on issue 332 by dorma...@rydia.net: The configuration of item size (-I) does not work? http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=332 Please use a newer version of memcached, sorry! -- You received this message because this project is conf

Re: Issue 334 in memcached: Memcached distrubured and replications??

Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #1 on issue 334 by dorma...@rydia.net: Memcached distrubured and replications?? http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=334 I'd say "please use the mailing list", but I think I'm better off saying "please read the mailing list archives bu

Re: Issue 333 in memcached: How to create a Memcached file??

Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #3 on issue 333 by dorma...@rydia.net: How to create a Memcached file?? http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=333 You've got to the kidding me. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notificat

Re: Binary vs text protocol efficiency

Benchmarking binprot is nearly useless: there's nothing inherent in the protocol which makes it any faster for raw requests/responses. It does give your application more flexiblity on doing your gets/sets. IE: noreply commands for issuing sets without waiting for the response. You can also pack set

Re: Re: Is memcached unable to handle large number of connections?

Esta conta de email não está mais em uso. A mensagem não foi entregue. Favor reenvie para alexandre.alme...@hti.com.br This account is no longer in use. The message wasn't delivered. Please resend the message to alexandre.alme...@hti.com.br -- --- You received this message because you are s

Re: Is memcached unable to handle large number of connections?

> Actually have been using memcached for years and didn't have any problem, but > find a new memcached proxy called "twemproxy" and it said: > >  - Maintains persistent server connections. >  - Keeps connection count on the backend caching servers low. > > Actually what wrong with memcached on the