Well, that learns me for trying to write software without the 10+ VM
buildbots...
The i386 one, can you include the output of stats settings, and also
manually run: lru_crawler enable (or start with -o lru_crawler) then run
stats settings again please? Really weird that it fails there, but not
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:43 PM, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
Well, that learns me for trying to write software without the 10+ VM
buildbots...
The i386 one, can you include the output of stats settings, and also
manually run: lru_crawler enable (or start with -o lru_crawler) then run
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:43 PM, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
Well, that learns me for trying to write software without the 10+ VM
buildbots...
The i386 one, can you include the output of stats settings, and also
manually run: lru_crawler enable (or start with
Er... reading comprehension fail. I meant 64bit binary still at the
bottom there.
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014, dormando wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:43 PM, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
Well, that learns me for trying to write software without the 10+ VM
buildbots...
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 1:45 PM, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:43 PM, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
Well, that learns me for trying to write software without the 10+
VM
buildbots...
The i386 one, can you include the output of stats
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 1:45 PM, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
Any chance you could start the memcached-debug binary under gdb and then
crash it the same way? Get a full stack trace.
Thinking if I even have a 32bit
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014, Dan McGee wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 1:45 PM, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:43 PM, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
Well, that learns me for trying to write software without the
10+ VM
buildbots...
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 2:18 PM, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014, Dan McGee wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 1:45 PM, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:43 PM, dormando dorma...@rydia.net
wrote:
Well, that learns me for
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0xf7dbfb40 (LWP 7)]
0xf7f7f988 in __lll_unlock_elision () from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0
(gdb) bt
#0 0xf7f7f988 in __lll_unlock_elision () from
/usr/lib/libpthread.so.0
#1
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 2:45 PM, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
One machine was an i7 with TSX, thus the lock elision segfaults. The
other is a much older Core2 machine. Enough differences there to cause
problems, especially if we are dealing with threading-type things?
Can you give me
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 5:23 PM, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 2:45 PM, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
One machine was an i7 with TSX, thus the lock elision segfaults.
The other is a much older Core2 machine. Enough differences there to
cause
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 6:05 PM, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
Once I wrapped my head around it, figured this one out. This cheap patch
fixes the test, although I'm not sure it is the best actual solution.
Because we don't set the lru_crawler_running flag on the main thread, but
in
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 6:05 PM, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
Once I wrapped my head around it, figured this one out. This cheap
patch fixes the test, although I'm not sure it is the best actual solution.
Because we don't set the lru_crawler_running flag on the main
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #3 on issue 361 by dorma...@rydia.net: Segfault in memcached
(slabs.c) 1.4.15, patch provided.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=361
I'm going to close this. *please* let us know if the bug is reproducable
under .17 or newer.
--
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #3 on issue 350 by dorma...@rydia.net: memcached: SASL
authentication not working in CentOS 6 64-bit
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=350
I don't think you can do that so far as I know :( sorry.
--
You received this message because
15 matches
Mail list logo
