Re: Issue 363 in memcached: MemcachePool::get(): Server 127.0.0.1 (tcp 11211, udp 0) failed with: Network timeout

2014-05-09 Thread dormando
Can you give me a list (privately, if need be) of a few things: - The exact OS your server is running (centos/redhat release/etc) - The exact kernel version (and where it came from? centos/rh proper or a 3rd party repo?) - Full list of your 3rd party repos, since I know you had some random french

Re: Multi-get implementation in binary protocol

2014-05-09 Thread dormando
Unfortunately binprot isn't that much faster processing wise... what it does give you is a bunch of safe features (batching set's, mixing sets/gets and the like). You *can* reduce the packet load on the server a bit by ensuring your client is actually batching the binary multiget packets together,

Re: Multi-get implementation in binary protocol

2014-05-09 Thread Byung-chul Hong
Hello, Ryan, dormando, Thanks a lot for the clear explanation and the comments. I'm trying to find out how many requests I can batch as a muli-get within the allowed latency. I think multi-get has many advantages, the only penalty is the longer latency as pointed out in the above answer. But, the