> >
>
> I'll need to check more carefully. If that's true, the tests should show
> data corruption (and they did a few times during development). Take a look
> at the tests for the chunked item support?
>
> IE: If I allocate a new page to a slab class, the sequential bytes get
> chopped up into a
On Monday, October 3, 2016 at 9:17:00 PM UTC-4, Dormando wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016, yuantao peng wrote:
>
> > Hi, --I am reading memcached source code and got a question on this
> function: do_slabs_alloc_chunked, it is called by do_slabs_alloc if the
> request size is larger
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016, yuantao peng wrote:
> Hi, -- I am reading memcached source code and got a question on this
> function: do_slabs_alloc_chunked, it is called by do_slabs_alloc if the
> request size is larger than
> the slabclass size. I am curious why we don't just move to a
Hi, --
I am reading memcached source code and got a question on this function:
do_slabs_alloc_chunked, it is called by do_slabs_alloc if the request
size is larger than the slabclass size. I am curious why we don't just
move to a slabclass with larger size instead? Also, I am not sure
