Re: Memcached/repcached: the need for repcached

2014-08-06 Thread PenguinWhispererThe
I found out we use it as some sort of temporary storage. So not actually as a layer in between. If one of the memcached nodes goes down we would loose this information (mostly only needed for a few minutes) and for compliancy we can't write this data to disk. Op woensdag 6 augustus 2014 08:13:4

Re: Memcached/repcached: the need for repcached

2014-08-06 Thread PenguinWhispererThe
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:45 AM, PenguinWhispererThe > > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I wonder what the added value for repcached > > is(http://repcached.lab.klab.org/). > > It replicates the objects to both configured nodes. So you can read the > > cached valu

Re: Memcached/repcached: the need for repcached

2014-08-06 Thread PenguinWhispererThe
server start > > > 2014-08-05 12:45 GMT-03:00 PenguinWhispererThe >: > >> Hi all, >> >> I wonder what the added value for repcached is( >> http://repcached.lab.klab.org/). >> It replicates the objects to both configured nodes. So you can read the >

Memcached/repcached: the need for repcached

2014-08-05 Thread PenguinWhispererThe
Hi all, I wonder what the added value for repcached is(http://repcached.lab.klab.org/). It replicates the objects to both configured nodes. So you can read the cached value on all nodes even if it was added through the memcached on the other node. In the normal memcached there is a constant h