I appreciate the work you do on this package.
Mike Hosken
Sent via my iPhone
> On 20/06/2020, at 12:34, Roberto Spadim wrote:
>
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"memcached" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
It was a clean build, I will setup a reverse ssh session and give you access
to the machine. Will do this tomorrow.
Mike
Sent from my iPhone
> On 29/07/2019, at 13:23, dormando wrote:
>
> you're sure it was a clean compile after the NEED_ALIGN change?
>
> Any idea
5
at ip=0x0002dbe7
Thanks Mike
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"memcached" group.
To unsubscribe from th
le-objc-gc=auto
--enable-multiarch --disable-werror --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--enable-checking=release --build=hppa-linux-gnu --host=hppa-linux-gnu
--target=hppa-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.3.0 (Debian 8.3.0-7)
On Saturday, July 27, 2019 at 6:22:38 PM UTC+12, mike hosken wrote:
>
ailed.
make: *** [Makefile:1987: test] Aborted
root@atlantis-isp:/srv/memcached-1.5.16#
out put from fresh build
Mike
**
On Saturday, July 27, 2019 at 6:22:38 PM UTC+12, mike hosken wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have been trying to build memcached on debian hppa linux
&
000f8d3f4c3 at ip=0x0002e01f
[10778.167050] memcached-debug(7220): unaligned access to
0xf8d3f4c7 at ip=0x0002e09b
[10778.171719] memcached-debug(7220): unaligned access to
0xf8d3f4ce at ip=0x0002e01f
Can someone help me to fix this issue??
Mike Hosken
m.
I am very new to databases and I am trying to simply write queries in MySql
(workbench). I am not creating a web app. Will memcached help speed up
MySQL if I am not creating a web app?
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"memcached" group.
To unsu
best way to solve this
problem?
Thanks in advance,
Mike
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"memcached" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.c
libmemcached to connect to memcached.
Any ideas for tweaks to kernel settings or libmemcached settings to keep
this from happening? We use ketama/md5 for our hashing, and have
tcp_nodelay and noblock enabled.
Thanks,
Mike
We're getting this error sometimes on a memcache call in php on
memcache->get( "some key" );
PHP Notice: Memcache::get() memcache.get:
Server 192.168.100.53 (tcp 11211) failed with: (null) (0)
And I can't find anything online about this error. Is this a time out
or what's going on here?
-Original Message-
From: memcached@googlegroups.com [mailto:memcac...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of loc
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 11:46 PM
To: memcached
Subject: Re: wave invites
Could I get an invite?
Thank you
Laurent
On Dec 8, 5:32 pm, Clint Webb wrote:
> Oops. sorry list
cally rebalance the pool, automating the
one-at-a-time "slabs reassign" behavior to make it more effective.
Mike
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 06:42, dl4ner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> The thing is that we use a linked list to store all of the items in.
>> Every time a user tr
Incidentally, why was "mallinfo" removed from memcache 1.4.0? Even
without it being 64-bit aware, it still provided some useful data that
I wasn't able to get via other means in our 1.2.6 binaries.
Mike
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 03:13, Mike Lambert wrote:
> Basically process
extra 10-13% of
RAM out of our memcaches sounds like a great idea. And so given my
fragmentation conclusion, I was looking for ways to reduce that.
Thoughts? Is there perhaps another explanation for the data above?
Thanks,
Mike
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 19:40, Matt Ingenthron wrote:
>
Trond, any thoughts?
I'd like to double-check that there isn't a reason we can't support
preallocation without getpagesizes() before attempting to manually
patch memcache and play with our production system here.
Thanks,
Mike
On Jul 13, 8:38 pm, Mike Lambert wrote:
> On Jul
On Jul 10, 1:37 pm, Matt Ingenthron wrote:
> Mike Lambert wrote:
> > Currently the -L flag is only enabled if
> > HAVE_GETPAGESIZES&&HAVE_MEMCNTL. I'm curious what the motivation is
> > for something like that? In our experience, for some memcache pools we
&g
m to crash, but I'm not sure if that's
a proper litmus test. What are the pros/cons of doing something like
this?
Thanks,
Mike
--- memcached.c 2009-07-10 11:22:58.40858 -0700
+++ ../memcached-1.4.0-orig/memcached.c 2009-07-10 11:22:09.715629000
-0700
@@ -3761,11 +3761,13 @@
That is what I figured you'd say, just wanted to make sure.
In that case, very nice! :)
Mike.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Josh Dybnis wrote:
>
> The benchmark numbers on the page were done with 4 client threads. I
> did a little testing with more and there wasn't an
it was
designed. Don't mess with that."
Mike.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Josh Dybnis wrote:
>
> memcached-prefix is an experimental fork off of the memcached 1.3
> development branch. It adds commands pget and pdelete that operate on
> ranges of keys having a common prefix
This is neat. I can see many useful reasons for this.
However, wouldn't it be simple enough to make a UI using PHP or
something that was totally portable and you could list multiple
servers and such? This says "built in" to memcached. Maybe that's what
scares me... is this actually bolted into me
the php pecl memcache module supports writing to multiple nodes i
believe. of course it isn't foolproof but it would help maybe storing
two copies on different servers so there is less chance of a stampede
if one goes down.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:08 PM, theRat wrote:
>
> I'm still curious abo
avoid any
evictions at all, even of expired stuff that would be deleted on the next
fetch of that item anyway.
I've included my entirely untested patch below, to show what I mean. (I
don't actually use evict_to_free==0, so it doesn't matter that much to me,
but I thought I'd ask a
EAT SANDWICH
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:19 PM, David Rolston wrote:
> Why do people who are too stupid/lazy to read the simplest directions join
> groups like this.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:02 PM, NICK VERBECK wrote:
>
>>
>> Unsubscribe here:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/memcach
loadtest frameworks that would make such a change easier to
evaluate?
Thanks,
Mike
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 06:30, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Mike Lambert wrote:
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> We use memcached in a big way here, so I started diggin
e subtle (or obvious) that I'm missing.
Thanks!
Mike
properly on their TVs and things like that
(http://products.sel.sony.com/opensource/), which is less than
facebook just did.
--Todd
On Dec 12, 4:27 pm, mike wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Dustin wrote:
If anyone at facebook is listening, is it possible at all to add
this work onto th
Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 6:01 PM, dormando wrote:
> memcached is BSD licensed... no goodwill is technically required. it's just
> considered anti-goodwill to code dump and stalk off.
gotcha. i wasn't sure. licenses confuse me, and i was too lazy to even
see what memcached was using :)
agreed thoug
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Dustin wrote:
> If anyone at facebook is listening, is it possible at all to add
> this work onto the codebase where everyone else has been working?
+1
not to mention couldn't that technically be required in the
GPL/whatever license memcached is under?
Hi Aaron,
Have you looked at beanstalkd? It seems to have its own protocol that fits
the bill fairly well.
Cheers,
Mike
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Aaron Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I've been lately about message queues, and noticing there are
Try http://memcachedb.org/. I've been successful with it, doing very similar
things that you are.
-Mike
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all-
> I have a very simple and particular use case- I'd like to use
> memcached to serve
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Ricky Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think there is a RHEL package in EPEL:
> Set the repo up as mentioned at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#howtouse and
> # yum install memcached
Thanks. Was able to get both there, and swap out some custom
downlo
27;s why I was
hoping to get a richer RPM install from someone who knows it better
than I do :)
Thanks.
- mike
I have no preference. Feel free to remove it. I ignore it anyway.
On Aug 31, 2008, at 6:28 PM, dormando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yo,
>
> That goofy google groups footer that appeared when I moved the
> list(s).
> Anyone mind terrible if I turn that off?
>
> >
--~--~-~--~~---
33 matches
Mail list logo
