Out of curiosity; were you running into performance problems or just
wanting to get it working?
I've found that huge pages have some payoff but I kept getting better
improvements by fixing other things :)
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017, 'Mario Niebla' via memcached wrote:
> Ah, ok...thanks for the info.
Ah, ok...thanks for the info. I'll do that.
cheers,
/m
On Monday, July 3, 2017 at 12:34:42 PM UTC-7, Dormando wrote:
>
> It never actually worked in linux... support was written for solaris and
> I've never prioritized doing it in linux.
>
> You should open an issue on the github repo so
It never actually worked in linux... support was written for solaris and
I've never prioritized doing it in linux.
You should open an issue on the github repo so people can register
interest there; it shouldn't be too hard to do once some other stuff has
settled down.
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017, 'Mario
Has anyone ever gotten the '-L' (large page support) to work in Linux?
I know my amazon 2017.03 AMI kernel supports huge-pages.
In theory, I have set up my box 512 huge pages at 2MB each so I can start
memcached with a 1GB cache size.
I've verified this by doing `cat /proc/meminfo |grep
